Forums › Drugs › Cannabis & Hashish › Cannabis ‘disrupts brain centre’
2 pieces of research show changes in brain activity caused by THC and CBD (active ingredients in cannabis)
personally, i think common sense and experience would tell you that hydro is a pretty different thing to naturally grown weed… anyway, it’s interesting to understand why>>>
Cannabis ‘disrupts brain centre’
Scientists have shown how cannabis may trigger psychotic illnesses such as schizophrenia.
A King’s College London team gave healthy volunteers the active ingredient tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
They then recorded reduced activity in an area of the brain which keeps inappropriate thoughts at bay.
THC levels are thought to have doubled in street cannabis in recent years – at the expense of other ingredients which may have a beneficial effect.
A separate study has shown that one of these ingredients – cannabidiol (CBD) – has the potential to dampen down psychotic symptoms, and could form the basis of new treatments.
The research will be discussed at a conference on the impact of cannabis use to be held at the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College this week.
DependencyAlthough figures are not kept, it is estimated that as many as 500,000 people in the UK may be dependent on cannabis.
Increasing numbers of people are seeking help for cannabis problems at specialist clinics. In 2005, only heroin users accounted for a greater proportion of patients.
Experts are concerned that street cannabis is becoming increasingly potent. It is thought that average THC content has risen from 6% to 12% in recent years.
The Institute of Psychiatry study gave THC, CBD or placebo capsules to adult male volunteers who had not abused cannabis.
They then carried out brain scans, and a battery of tests, and found that those who took THC showed reduced activity in an area of the brain called the inferior frontal cortex, which keeps inappropriate thoughts and behaviour, such as swearing and paranoia in check.
The effects were short-lived, but some people appeared more vulnerable than others.
In a second study, a team from Yale University administered THC intravenously.
Even at relatively low doses, they found 50% of healthy volunteers began to show symptoms of psychosis.
Volunteers who already had a history of psychotic symptoms appeared to be particularly vulnerable.
Side effects
A third study, by the University of Cologne, compared the effect of CBD and a commonly used anti-psychotic medicine, Amisulpride, on 42 patients with a history of schizophrenia.
After four weeks both groups showed a reduction in psychotic symptoms, but the CBD group were less prone to side effects, such as muscle stiffness and weight gain.
The researchers warned that THC and CBD compete with each other biochemically, so a rise in THC levels would blunt any positive impact of CBD.
Professor Robin Murray, a consultant psychiatrist at the Institute of Psychiatry, said the research provided the strongest evidence that cannabis had a significant impact on the brain.
He said proving a long-term effect was extremely difficult, as it was not ethical or feasible to stimulate long-term psychosis in volunteers.
However, he said: “If something has an active effect in inducing the symptoms of psychosis after one dose, then it would not be at all surprising if repeated use induced the chronic condition.”
Professor Murray also warned that the high potency cannabis now widely available was likely to pose a much bigger risk to health than the significantly weaker formulations of previous years.
“It is similar to comparing the effect of drinking a glass of wine at the weekend with drinking a bottle of vodka every day.”
Marjorie Wallace, of the mental health charity Sane, called the research a “significant contribution” to the understanding of the dangers of cannabis.
“Sane has been saying for years that there is a link between psychosis and the drug, particularly in its more potent forms.
“We strongly urge the government to heed the growing evidence and take urgent action to warn young people that some of them are risking lifelong mental illness – that they are playing Russian roulette with their minds.”
So they administerd pills oraly and injected others, did anyone actually try giving the guinea pigs a real spliff? Surely doing the same tests on long term smokers would have been more effective?
where does it say that?
did anyone actually try giving the guinea pigs a real spliff?
:weee:
i think the two tudies show what a lot of people already knew by smoking hydo… that increasing the levels of thc without the other ingrdients to balance it out make for a funny brain
I might have misunderstood it too.:crazy_diz
Interesting stuff,
I was at the cannabis conference last year and I think they presented the same studys
personally, i think common sense and experience would tell you that hydro is a pretty different thing to naturally grown weed… anyway, it’s interesting to understand why>>>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6606931.stm
its says they administered thc and cbd and a placebo in capsules
then a second study at yale administered intraveiniously
WHOOOOAH HANG ON HANG ON
They then recorded reduced activity in an area of the brain which keeps inappropriate thoughts at bay.”
That just takes the piss.
And let’s face facts, there’s no “badness” centre in the brain, and ppl trying to give a solid basis for “inappropriate thoughts” just makes me laugh. HAHAHAHA.
Like the school bully saying “he’s a fatty, so l hit him” oh yeah, the bully’s messed up in the head, but no, the victim has to be messed up in the head not the bully, so the victim has been having inappropriate thoughts…and there’s a more tangible reason for picking on him… he’s a fatty, as you can see… or rather, his genes mean that he has the “badness” brain region activated, caused by the “badness gene” LMAO.
I’m wondering what kind of Bludclot comes up with such studies. Ya know what, the only difference between half of those crazies and the “scientists” is the way they wear their white coats lmao.
There’s possibly not even any basis for Biological Psychiatry. Yeah there’s a lot of loonies agreeing, saying the same thing, e.g. the Antipsychiatry movement and even the Scientologists. They are nutters yeah, but they still have a point.
But that don’t matter, the facts remain, a beaker of serotonin isn’t “happy”. A jar full of noradrenaline isn’t “buzzing on coke”.
The brain is just chemicals and cells. For someone to come along and say that this or that chemical or brain cell group is “badness” or “incorrect” is A MAGICAL BELIEF.
It’s the soul that is good or bad, at the end of the day. When the mind is hurt, just like when the skin is cut, it can cause bad, agonised reactions. But at the end of the day, that could just be explained by action and reaction.
Innate badness is in the soul.
And believing in the soul isn’t a magical belief, it is simply that part of you that feels, that is acted on by chemicals etc, that you are born with, that is you.
For all we know, the soul could just be energy flow from broken down food. Face facts, there aint no soul in your body til your mum supplies you food via the umbilical cord.
So even as far as the soul goes, it doesn’t mean you can prove the existence of another dimension of being etc. There are 2 sides of the story always, the soul could be from another dimension or it could just be the result of metabolism of food, the energy released therefrom.
The point: THC does not cause evil by a chemical process in the brain. You can’t just dub THC as evil, and then dub a smoker’s brain as evil, and then dub the smoker as evil.
totally agree about the “inappropriate thoughts” passage. why do people smoke ganja? because it expands your conciousness and stimulates your creativity. are salvidor dali’s paintings “inappropriate”? what about the writing of sigmund freud? inapprpiate thoughts are what stimulates the progression of humanity, and whether the squares liek it or not, cannabis has helped some of the great minds become greater by throwing off the shackles of “appropiate” thinking.
surely thinign ouitside the box is a good thing?
i cant beleive the anti-ganja hysteria/proeganda that is rife at the moment. all national newspapers seem to be on the band wagon. i would say its obvious to anyone who smokes ganj that if you are mentally ill it can make you worse. but all this “ganja causes psychosis/schizophrenia” is pure bullshit.
and these studies show how
Oh yeah, that’s fair enough buddy, and l’ve always disliked skunk because it doesn’t have the rich, full, phat chemical profile that low-grade natural weed does. I thought they were being a bit rude by latching onto all this “inappropriate thoughts” nonsense in their wording though, no need for it at all.
0
Voices
10
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Drugs › Cannabis & Hashish › Cannabis ‘disrupts brain centre’