Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Crackdown on illegal raves

Forums Drugs Cocaine & Crack Crackdown on illegal raves

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Quote:
    John Carvel, social affairs editor
    Tuesday June 5, 2007

    [FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]The Guardian[/FONT]

    A crackdown on illegal raves to prevent “irreparable damage to the countryside” during the summer festival season was launched last night by the Local Government Association. It placed councils on a state of high alert to tackle a revival of the drug-fuelled raves and free parties that dominated youth culture from the late 1980s until the mid-1990s.

    Predicting a return to a summer of illegal parties, the association warned councils that young people had tired of mainstream bands and were turning to “nu-rave” music that was not available at established clubs and festivals. It urged local authorities to scan MySpace and internet message boards to gather intelligence of plans for illegal raves which could “ruin the lives of local residents” and expose music lovers to risks in places beyond the easy reach of the emergency services. Council staff should also visit pubs and clubs to pick up flyers advertising such events.

    “The internet and mobile phone technology make illegal raves easier and quicker to organise than back in their heyday when word of mouth was key,” a spokeswoman said.

    Five people were arrested after police in riot gear broke up a rave attended by about 3,000 in Wentwood Forest, Monmouthshire, in April. Last month a police car was destroyed while officers were trying to disperse about 500 ravers at a former airfield on land owned by a Conservative peer in Suffolk.

    The association said: “Illegal raves could sweep the nation again this summer, with many taking place around festival days.” South-west England and the home counties were the most likely locations. It provided councils with a five-point plan to get ahead of the game.

    If an illegal event was being organised, councils should help the organisers apply for a temporary event licence on suitable land.

    They should work with the police and local landowners and set out plans and powers, such as injunctions and the seizing of sound equipment.

    They should gather intelligence of future events by scanning the internet and visiting pubs and clubs. Councils should also ask landowners and residents to remain vigilant, particularly around festival days and bank holidays, and consider setting up designated “free party” sites to avoid damage to the countryside, and a hotline for residents to call if they have concerns about illegal events taking place.

    The association has identified Klaxons, New Young Pony Club, Shitdisco, Trash Fashion and Hot Chip as leading exponents of nu-rave, described by a council spokeswoman as “punk meets disco”.

    She said: “We don’t want to be seen as party poopers. Councils have people’s best interests at heart and we want to encourage freedom of choice. People should be able to listen to whatever music they like. But we do want these events to be as safe and manageable as possible.”

    Examples of effective action included intelligence gathering by South Somerset district council which prevented 80 illegal events from taking place. Chris White, chairman of the Local Government Association’s culture, tourism and sport board, said: “We need the eyes and ears of local people.

    “Some raves are nothing more than a nuisance, but others pose a serious threat to the environment and to public safety. Many partygoers take dangerous chemical cocktails, with limited access to the emergency services, putting themselves and others at great risk.

    “The impact of raves can be more than just a bit of noise and a minor disturbance. Councils strive to keep the places where people live clean and tidy, and the effects on wildlife and farmland can be irreversible, causing financial and natural ruin as a result of land being littered with human waste and rubbish.” If the event organisers had nothing to hide, they should talk to their council about putting on a legitimate party. “But if their motives are less honourable, they will be dealt with by using the full force of the law,” he added.

    somebody put this an i agree …..

    I dunno, i have to say that is the most positive action for parties i’ve ever heard of!

    Locals/Councils and Government have every right to be pissed off about damaged land and disturbance to locals, and the positive message about land and help from councils is very hopefull imo, although of course it will take a long time for the message to sink in to middle england i’m sure, i think this is a good step towards stopping the perconceptions most people have

    quote electric mirror icon_arrow.gif

    yeah that part is quite good. cos alot of us would be very happy to do it properley and legally!

    I hate the fact that not everyone that attends the unlicenced outdoors dont respect the land like at the last one I was at, there where haybarrels covered in plasic and some fuckwits ripped off the plastic.. so obviously someone is gonna be very pissed off about having to recover them!!! why the fuck do that?!! it just makes them even more annoyed!!

    im sorry about always saying u ppl are paranoid about the police checking this website, but there it is in writing.

    what are they talking about everyone hates new rave, except for maybe hot chip

    i like the idea of organised areas, cos free partys wont change that much they will just be in an organised place, there will be the same police presence

    i do think the gaurdian has got some bits wrong like the drug fuelled ppl, and that everyone damages property

    i say government is gonna stop us, they are gonna have to work with us

    Yeah there are some fairly reasonable points made there, and if the advice is actually carried out then it will be a benefit to everyone.

    It’s pure comedy that they think there is a resurgence of parties and that the Klaxons and co are responsible due to not being able to hear their ever so underground music in clubs.

    The guardian is in the business of selling papers to make money – a report on how free parties are ok and mostly dont cause any trouble is just going to get them into trouble with their readers as [lets face it] its not what they want to hear…

    Good point about designated ares for raves. That way all the rigs would turn up at the same spot and the partys would be madness!

    its a small carrot and a lot of potential sticks, but still a concession compared to what has happened before.

    Its also clear from the issues mentioned in the article what the ravers are being pulled up on today isn’t just out of nimbyism, but real and actual problems that badly-run events cause, such as rubbish being left behind, environmental damage, and people (often due to excessive drug use) getting injured or injuring someone else and the Ambulance Service having difficulty getting to the casualties.

    Until these issues are addressed the rest of society isn’t going to tolerate and accept parties, particularly as they end up paying for the clear up..

    april wrote:
    John Carvel, social affairs editor
    Tuesday June 5, 2007

    [FONT=Geneva,Arial,sans-serif]The Guardian[/FONT]

    The association has identified Klaxons, New Young Pony Club, Shitdisco, Trash Fashion and Hot Chip as leading exponents of nu-rave, described by a council spokeswoman as punk meets disco.

    She said: We don’t want to be seen as party poopers. Councils have people’s best interests at heart and we want to encourage freedom of choice..

    Are they having a laugh?

    djprocess wrote:
    Are they having a laugh?

    bear in mind that few councillors in some areas are under the age of 45 these days – and out of those which are younger, many would be afraid to admit any in-depth knowledge of a scene linked wiht “drugs culture” or they could be stitched up, even by “colleagues” of their own party..

    if you think about how festivals have gone

    ages ago there were only a few

    a bit ago there were a few more

    a little bit after that there were a few more than there were a bit ago

    then lately there are quite a few

    now there are fucking loads!

    in the future they may be everyweekend with these designated PARTYPLACES1

    :laugh_at: they issue stuff like this every year about this time ….

    they issue stuff like this every year about this time ….

    its the first time though I have ever heard the authorities actually suggest tolerance zones or designated areas..

    Designated party areas are a great idea but I think we’re a long way from this becoming the norm.

    In my opinion this will just lead to controls being put on partys such as security and a controled closing time……Hmmm, sounds all too familiar to me.

    :laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at: Nu rave is responsible for free partys!! Comedy! :weee:

    Designated party sites in otherwords legal , security & police controlled !

    No Thanks !

    and chargable entry..as who would pay the security ….ohh the mind runs riot …it will never happen ..:group_hug

0

Voices

19

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Drugs Cocaine & Crack Crackdown on illegal raves