Forums › Drugs › Drugs Research, Drugs Studies & Media Requests › Research refutes idea of marijuana as a gateway drug
Never thought I’d hear something so sensible coming out of the states at the moment.
December 31, 2006
Research refutes idea of marijuana as a gateway drug
Pg. 66
Marijuana is not a “gateway” drug that predicts or eventually leads to substance abuse, suggests a 12-year University of Pittsburgh study. Moreover, the study’s findings call into question the long-held belief that has shaped prevention efforts and governmental policy for six decades and caused many a parent to panic upon discovering a bag of pot in their child’s bedroom.
The Pitt researchers tracked 214 boys beginning at ages 10-12, all of whom eventually used either legal or illegal drugs. When the boys reached age 22, they were categorized into three groups: those who used only alcohol or tobacco, those who started with alcohol and tobacco and then used marijuana (gateway se-quence) and those who used marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco (reverse sequence).
Nearly a quarter of the study population who used both legal and illegal drugs at some point – 28 boys – exhibited the reverse pattern of using marijuana prior to alcohol or tobacco, and those individuals were no more likely to develop a substance use disorder than those who followed the traditional succession of alcohol and tobacco before illegal drugs, according to the study, which appears in a recent issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.
“The gateway progression may be the most common pattern, but it’s certainly not the only order of drug use,” said Ralph E. Tarter, PhD, professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy and lead author of the study. “In fact, the reverse pattern is just as accurate for predicting who might be at risk for developing a drug dependence disorder.”
In addition to determining whether the gateway hypothesis was a better predictor of substance abuse than competing theories, the investigators sought to identify characteristics that distinguished users in the gateway sequence from those who took the reverse path. Out of the 35 variables they examined, only three emerged to be differentiating factors: Reverse pattern users were more likely to have lived in poor physical neighborhood environments, had more exposure to drugs in their neighborhoods and had less parental in-volvement as young children. Most importantly, a general inclination for deviance from sanctioned behaviors, which can become evident early in childhood, was strongly associated with all illicit drug use, whether it came in the gateway sequence, or the reverse.
While the gateway theory posits that each type of drug is associated with certain specific risk factors that cause the use of subsequent drugs, such as cigarettes or alcohol leading to marijuana, this study’s findings indicate that environmental aspects have stronger influence on which type of substance is used. That is, if it’s easier for a teen to get his hands on marijuana than beer, then he’ll be more likely to smoke pot. This evi-dence supports what’s known as the common liability model, an emerging theory that states the likelihood that someone will transition to the use of illegal drugs is determined not by the preceding use of a particular drug but instead by the user’s individual tendencies and environmental circumstances.
“The emphasis on the drugs themselves, rather than other, more important factors that shape a person’s behavior, has been detrimental to drug policy and prevention programs,” Dr. Tarter said. “To become more effective in our efforts to fight drug abuse, we should devote more attention to interventions that address these issues, particularly to parenting skills that shape the child’s behavior as well as peer and neighborhood environments.”
Indeed, according to the study, interventions focusing on behavior modification may be more effective prevention tactics than current anti-drug initiatives. For example, providing guidance to parents – particularly those in high-risk neighborhoods – on how to boost their caregiving skills and foster bonding with their chil-dren, could have a measurable effect on a child’s likelihood to smoke marijuana. Also, early identification of children who exhibit antisocial tendencies could allow for interventions before drug use even begins.
Although this research has significant implications for drug abuse prevention approaches, Dr. Tarter notes that the study has some limitations. First, as only male behaviors were studied, further investigation should explore if the results apply to women as well. Also, the examination of behaviors in phases beyond alcohol and marijuana consumption in the gateway series will be necessary.
This article was prepared by Disease Risk Factor Week editors from staff and other reports. Copyright 2006, Disease Risk Factor Week via NewsRx.com.
Honestly, i did not read the entire article, but i did have an epiphany of my own. There is no other drug like weed, if you “graduate” to cocaine (a stimulant) then you’ve just lost the semi-narcotic affect of weed. And if you “graduate” to heroin (a narcotic), then you’ve just lost the slightly stimulating affect of weed. Not to mention that either way you’re losing the hallucinogenic affect of weed. Weed is just so much different then other drugs, the gateway theory does not make logical sense.
@Blazing Boom Bud 490319 wrote:
Honestly, i did not read the entire article, but i did have an epiphany of my own. There is no other drug like weed, if you “graduate” to cocaine (a stimulant) then you’ve just lost the semi-narcotic affect of weed. And if you “graduate” to heroin (a narcotic), then you’ve just lost the slightly stimulating affect of weed. Not to mention that either way you’re losing the hallucinogenic affect of weed. Weed is just so much different then other drugs, the gateway theory does not make logical sense.
i had a thought… maybe all of these drugs are independant of each other… maybe there is no thread between them, no gateway, no black and white scale of good to bad except in your imagination, where you can categorise and put things into little pigeon holes to your heart’s content and feel at peace that you’ve made the right choice as you view the world through your chosen lens. maybe not everything about weed is good… maybe not everything about ‘other drugs’ are bad… maybe the human desire to categorise everything is often futile simplification that can set us on a windy path out to a place high in opinion but low in fact… maybe understanding what is isn’t quite so simple… maybe it takes a little more concentration… btw, did u finish reading the article bud?
A sample size of 214 is of bugger all merit.
The only “gateway” effect of marijuana is it’s illegality. Having to source it on the black market opens up a world of possibility for the purchase of other illegal drugs as you are forced to mix in those kind of circles.
this is true and the gateway drug argument is bogus – if any drugs are a gateway to illegal ones they are tobacco and alcohol and that is because the prohibitionists are now targeting them as well as illegal ones for another go. OK tobacco is bad and I quit smoking in 2009 but I still drink in moderation and the resurgence of anti booze puritanism worries me (I am against anti social behaviour on any drug and that should be stopped but there is some real nasty puritanism getting a foothold across Europe especially since the economic depression).
however for the benefit of the otherwise intelligent young American lad, bragging about how you “didn’t read the entire article” (which was relatively short and written in American English) does have the unfortunate habit of playing straight into the anti’s stereotypes of “dumbed down self centred stoners”.
In my teenage days there was a excellent book called “the Little Red School book” which though actually even older than my generation (was written before I was born) explained about the real issues with drugs. apart from getting nicked, the real problem was not that they stopped you thinking but distracted you from the stuff needed to pass exams etc, and everywhere in Europe – back then and still today (if you don’t pass enough of these you are permanently judged as “dumb” and your opinions ignored (often even if you manage to succeed in business if the business is a controversial one like arts/entertainment))
@General Lighting 490363 wrote:
this is true and the gateway drug argument is bogus
depends how you define “gateway drug” though really.
in the UK and Europe its usually an automatic claim that taking marijuana leads on to “harder” drugs. now there have been 40 years of various levels of “tolerant” social experiments across Europe with admittedly mixed results, but one thing which is clear is that todays consumers are quite capable of assessing the different effects of marijuana or something like stimulants or opiates and make an informed choice rather than 1960s/70s populist hysteria of “drug pushers”.
a parallel theory is that weekend recreational use of the chemical stimulants automatically results in use of addictive opiates or more highly processed cocaine – an argument used to downsize and limit the EDM scene as a “safety threat” to young people.
but now you get youths in north Essex going straight on to heroin or crack and not even touching party drugs, and yet “pill friendly” music events and genres have been restricted for over a decade now (if a DJ trys spinning even Tiësto in Colchester their venue managers get hassled by both civvy cops and even sometimes redcaps!)
@i_hope 490320 wrote:
i had a thought… maybe all of these drugs are independant of each other… maybe there is no thread between them, no gateway, no black and white scale of good to bad except in your imagination, where you can categorise and put things into little pigeon holes to your heart’s content and feel at peace that you’ve made the right choice as you view the world through your chosen lens. maybe not everything about weed is good… maybe not everything about ‘other drugs’ are bad… maybe the human desire to categorise everything is often futile simplification that can set us on a windy path out to a place high in opinion but low in fact… maybe understanding what is isn’t quite so simple… maybe it takes a little more concentration… btw, did u finish reading the article bud?
Yeah dude, and being a christian, i don’t even worry about making sense of it. I just thank God for the wonderful experience and go on my merry way!
@Blazing Boom Bud 490484 wrote:
Yeah dude, and being a christian, i don’t even worry about making sense of it. I just thank God for the wonderful experience and go on my merry way!
well if u r a christian, do u think God wants his believers to live with blinkers on while the infidels learn to make sense of it all?… maybe God’s like, ‘get these infidels workin out my baby, didn’t they realise they were s’posed to chill and stay simple, believe untruths and have a false understanding of the reality I made? ha!… now my faithful moles, go on your merry way and bomb me some soulless towelheads!… preferably ones with oil!’
…….. or maybe not
if we’re on the gateway vibe, what about sugar products and processed foods?… they are probably our first tastes of substance misuse
@i_hope 490545 wrote:
well if u r a christian, do u think God wants his believers to live with blinkers on while the infidels learn to make sense of it all?… maybe God’s like, ‘get these infidels workin out my baby, didn’t they realise they were s’posed to chill and stay simple, believe untruths and have a false understanding of the reality I made? ha!… now my faithful moles, go on your merry way and bomb me some soulless towelheads!… preferably ones with oil!’
…….. or maybe not
if we’re on the gateway vibe, what about sugar products and processed foods?… they are probably our first tastes of substance misuse
I have NEVER bombed anyone, nor do i necessarily choose to associate with Christians who do. I believe the REAL christian truth; God + Jesus = Love. If your hearing it differently, then your not hearing it from a profoundly actualized christian.
@Blazing Boom Bud 490870 wrote:
I have NEVER bombed anyone, nor do i necessarily choose to associate with Christians who do. I believe the REAL christian truth; God + Jesus = Love. If your hearing it differently, then your not hearing it from a profoundly actualized christian.
i wasn’t suggesting that you have bombed or have any ill intent, my point was just that if u ‘don’t worry about making sense of it’ cos God has got it all covered, then you’re living you’re life blindfolded hoping God will hold you’re hand and guide you through. in my opinion if you are happy to let God decide everything for you then you’re likely to be susceptible to being misguided by someone using religion for unsavoury means. there are a lot of people in the world that (imo) are very good at listening to others and being disciplined, but that are too scared/shortsighted/unwilling to engage their own logic and reasoning to see that they are actually making the choices that suit them…
so i’m not claiming that you will do anything other than good in your life, maybe this is because there is kindness in your heart that could never be overpowered, or maybe its only because you’re environment has not been one that would generate this kind of action… but i am saying that there are lot of people that put their trust in ‘God’ and listen wholeheartedly without any room for logic/reason/humility to religious leaders who use religion as a way of generating power by unifying people. and in this environment and with this state of mind a person is capable of… well anything really. also a lot of non-religious people are capable of being unified to do horrible things by some other means, but using religious beliefs as the unifying force seems to be very effective as all that is important is not in this world; i.e. God, heaven and hell (or however it works in a particular belief system): importance is placed on intangible things, thus making all that is tangible far less important. in this situation a feeling of supremacy may be experienced and with it a feeling of authority to make ‘God’s decisions’ in this world in a game of ‘God’s children’ vs ‘the inifidels’
anyhow this is an extreme end of the spectrum, but it was just to make a point. commonly religious people (as we all know) are really nice, kind people that surely if there is a God and heaven they will be one of the ones with a ticket. but if all religious people decide to stop thinking cos God’s holding their hand, and all the infidels go to hell, then God’s going to be left with the sticky end of the gene pool (pun intended :p). maybe God would like you to think for yourself, and in your case – have the attention span to read a whole article. conversely, if u can’t be bothered to read a whole article, maybe you’re opinions are likely to be somewhat narrow/naive. lastly it sounds quite discourteous to be like ‘i couldn’t be bothered to read the relatively short conclusions of a 12 year study that someone kindly shared, but i did have an epiphany of my own’ – lmao
I think life is a gateway to all drugs BAN LIFE!
@DaftFader 490942 wrote:
I think life is a gateway to all drugs BAN LIFE!
Right on!!!! I go kill my self now then
@DaftFader 490942 wrote:
I think life is a gateway to all drugs BAN LIFE!
i went to a bar with my new badminton club after it had finished and found this isn’t true… they all drunk fruit/lemonade/ fruit and lemonade drinks… i should have been like ‘has anyone got a spare line of mxe?… no? altho there would’v probably been some pitchfork action… :/
0
Voices
33
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Drugs › Drugs Research, Drugs Studies & Media Requests › Research refutes idea of marijuana as a gateway drug