Forums › Drugs › Research Chemicals › DE : Achtung, Achtung, Germany first EU nation to make newer RC’s illegal :(
My German has unfortunately got very rusty these days (Dutch is far easier TBH) but this is from a meeting of some health authority / medicines regulation and states that MPA, 5/6-APB, Ethylphenidate and Etizolam are to become controlled substances in Germany this year..
Meh, when/if the UK follows this it won’t stop people using them and I doubt if they’re popularity will decrease much.
Not really bothered about any of those chems being controlled, but I do recon the rest of the EU will follow suit soon enough, policy generally seems to be ‘If we cant tax the shit out of it then you cant have it’
@Mezz 533814 wrote:
Not really bothered about any of those chems being controlled, but I do recon the rest of the EU will follow suit soon enough, policy generally seems to be ‘If we cant tax the shit out of it then you cant have it’
This is true, but if politicians hold that view I simply adopt the view of ‘I’d rather fund the friendly terrorists that make my drugs than the corrupt arseholes that try to stop me taking them’ Mwahahaha.
@The Psyentist 533815 wrote:
This is true, but if politicians hold that view I simply adopt the view of ‘I’d rather fund the friendly terrorists that make my drugs than the corrupt arseholes that try to stop me taking them’ Mwahahaha.
lol no argument here, I dont care where my drugs come from, we hear that taking drugs funds organised crime, terrorism, corrupt regimes etc etc….. simple fix, make the drugs legal, produce them in the EU creating jobs, tax them to cover admin & such, and enforce proper quality control & factual education instead on criminalising normal peeps who dont want to be criminals, just want to have fun
@Mezz 533818 wrote:
lol no argument here, I dont care where my drugs come from, we hear that taking drugs funds organised crime, terrorism, corrupt regimes etc etc….. simple fix, make the drugs legal, produce them in the EU creating jobs, tax them to cover admin & such, and enforce proper quality control & factual education instead on criminalising normal peeps who dont want to be criminals, just want to have fun
TBH most centre left / socialist and green parties of the EU want to do just that (which makes perfect sense when you think that these parties tend to support public services which need tax money to fund them).
The sticking point is the backlash from the USA, which still exerts some economic power over Europe.
The Chinese won’t care, as they make all the drugs and even the predominantly Muslim countries turn a blind eye to their middle classes getting high (but not pissed) – why else are all the big trance DJ’s playing in Muslim countries this year? 😉
Unfortunately even if there was a massive change in the political makeup of the EU towards the left/green and legalisation right wingers won’t take it lying down, they too aren’t shy of “direct action” and there are plenty of wingnuts in the USA who would actively fund terrorist acts in Europe (after all they prolonged both sides of the Irish civil war for a bit until they were found out).
I expect some form of tolerance / legalisation will happen in Europe, but not without a backlash which might include bloodshed and/or even deliberate contamination of drug supplies by the prohibitionists.
@Mezz 533814 wrote:
Not really bothered about any of those chems being controlled, but I do recon the rest of the EU will follow suit soon enough, policy generally seems to be ‘If we cant tax the shit out of it then you cant have it’
The currently legal RC’s are taxed! The companies selling them do have proper registration details even if they aren’t widely advertised (easy enough to trace them if you know how) and have to pay corporation tax and VAT if they go above the threshold, and as HMRC and Border Force are essentially the same bunch the only way the companies can stay in business if if they behave, and those running them have admitted exactly that when quizzed by the UK Press about how it is all still alllowed.
I suspect what annoys the Germans is more that all these new drugs are often purchased from the UK, as their young folk know English and the UK vendors will deal in Euros. So all the money goes out of their country, whereas Hans the local drugsdealer still has to fill up his Audi with a few euros worth of petrol (or even ride his bicycle, and the Germans will easily spend €1000 on a bike particularly in some garish 1980s style colour) and probably meet people in beer halls and cafés, thus countributing more to the local economy.
Off topic I know, but by ‘Irish Civil War’ are you referring to the yanks of Irish origin funding the IRA ?
If yes I find it very amusing, not the acts of violence of course, they were both tragic & pointless, but the idea of Irish independence when all they have done is get some powers back from the UK and give them straight to the EU instead.
On the subject of taxation, yes RCs are taxed but not as they should be when you consider their actual use ( like alcohol & tobacco ), and if older safer drugs like MDMA were legalised the RC market would die overnight, MDMA for example could be taxed at 95% and if regulated & quality controlled still be cheaper than street prices, and still be a cheaper night out than drinking, a win for clubbers, a win for the taxman, a win for the police, pretty much a win for everyone except the alcohol industry.
@Mezz 533834 wrote:
Off topic I know, but by ‘Irish Civil War’ are you referring to the yanks of Irish origin funding the IRA ?[/quote]
yes, thats the one and it was well into the 1990s before President Clinton was sheepishly forced to admit his own citizens were funding terrorism in a supposedly friendly nation. Mind you the Yanks kept a stronghold in Northern Europe especially Germany well into the 1990s just to make sure that nothing too radical happened there, in fact I’ve just looked and there are still US soldiers there although they are supposedly standing down and vacating in 2015
List of United States Army installations in Germany – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:On the subject of taxation, yes RCs are taxed but not as they should be when you consider their actual use ( like alcohol & tobacco ), and if older safer drugs like MDMA were legalised the RC market would die overnight, MDMA for example could be taxed at 95% and if regulated & quality controlled still be cheaper than street prices, and still be a cheaper night out than drinking, a win for clubbers, a win for the taxman, a win for the police, pretty much a win for everyone except the alcohol industry.
this is basically what already happens to some extent in NL. OK the use of pills is not openly encouraged and nor are they taxed but there is clearly enough of a blind eye turned because it keeps the music venues and horecas going even during times of economic depression. And as you cannot do pills every weekend or you will eventually get unwell, people will still drink too, Heineken and Grolsch aren’t exactly bankrupt 😉
I agree there would always be drinkers even if MDMA & other drugs were legalised, but the alcohol industry would lose it’s stranglehold, a stranglehold it has spent vast amounts of money maintaining through donations to political parties, advertising it’s own crap & supporting demonisation of other drugs.
@Mezz 533854 wrote:
I agree there would always be drinkers even if MDMA & other drugs were legalised, but the alcohol industry would lose it’s stranglehold, a stranglehold it has spent vast amounts of money maintaining through donations to political parties, advertising it’s own crap & supporting demonisation of other drugs.
The double standards of the alcohol industry and the stranglehold it has on popular culture seem to only exist in the UK. Elsewhere in Northern Europe (even though they enjoy a drink as much as we do) things are different.
Its not easy to explain or unearth unless you not just start learning the languages, but start delving into ancient history of Germanic tribes going back to the fall of the Roman Empire all the way to modern globalised migration patterns of the 20th and 21st century, but it really does seem that the other Northern European peoples are far more sensible about getting pissed or high than we are in the UK.
To me when it comes to legalisation in general it strikes me as odd that tobacco companies are not lobbying more to get it legalised (though it seems that in the USA they are starting to do this more.) They are in a prime position to take advantage once this happens as they already have the capital, the manpower, and the industrial base to produce on a large scale. Likewise pharmaceuticals could easily produce things like MDMA, LSD, cocaine, heroin etc. If anything it makes a lot of economic sense because you stop pouring money into a losing war and start making money off taxes. It isn’t quite as simple as stated here, but if you put the systems in place to do in a similar way to alcohol or tobacco, it would probably work out.
@barrettone 534078 wrote:
To me when it comes to legalisation in general it strikes me as odd that tobacco companies are not lobbying more to get it legalised (though it seems that in the USA they are starting to do this more.) They are in a prime position to take advantage once this happens as they already have the capital, the manpower, and the industrial base to produce on a large scale. Likewise pharmaceuticals could easily produce things like MDMA, LSD, cocaine, heroin etc. If anything it makes a lot of economic sense because you stop pouring money into a losing war and start making money off taxes. It isn’t quite as simple as stated here, but if you put the systems in place to do in a similar way to alcohol or tobacco, it would probably work out.
Kind of a double edged sword for the tobacco industry to promote legalisation of weed
Smoking weed does lead to lots of people getting addicted to tobacco ( It’s how I & many I knew started smoked )
BUT
I find when I smoke weed I smoke a lot less tobacco, 1/3 of a spliff and I put it down in the ashtray or pass it to someone else, 3 peeps smoking fags will have 1 each, 3 having a spliff will share 1
Not sure they would make any more money, and if the same people who own shares in tobacco own shares in alcohol, Im sure alcohol sales would also drop if weed was sold legally
@Mezz 534152 wrote:
Kind of a double edged sword for the tobacco industry to promote legalisation of weed
Smoking weed does lead to lots of people getting addicted to tobacco ( It’s how I & many I knew started smoked )
BUT
I find when I smoke weed I smoke a lot less tobacco, 1/3 of a spliff and I put it down in the ashtray or pass it to someone else, 3 peeps smoking fags will have 1 each, 3 having a spliff will share 1
Not sure they would make any more money, and if the same people who own shares in tobacco own shares in alcohol, Im sure alcohol sales would also drop if weed was sold legally
I don’t think so really. They’d diversify their product base, and a lot of people who smoke weed also smoke cigarettes. I don’t think legalisation of weed would reduce drinking though. Drinking culture is very much ingrained in most western (and oriental really) countries and I can’t see the greater weed availability changing that.
0
Voices
15
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Drugs › Research Chemicals › DE : Achtung, Achtung, Germany first EU nation to make newer RC’s illegal :(