Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Proposed US ‘anti-social network’ legislation

Forums Life Politics, Media & Current Events Proposed US ‘anti-social network’ legislation

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Taken from:

    http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2006/05/11/antisocial_netw.html

    Earlier, i spoke about how the MySpace panic was likely to cause legislation proposals. Today, Congressperson Fitzpatrick proposed legislation to amend the Communications Act of 1934 “to require recipients of universal service support for schools and libraries to protect minors from commercial social networking websites and chat rooms.” This legislation broadly defines social network sites as anything that includes a Profile plus an ability to communicate with strangers. It covers social networking sites, chatrooms, bulletin boards. Obviously, the target is MySpace but most of our industry would be affected. Blogger, Flickr, Odeo, LiveJournal, Xanga, MySpace, Facebook, AIM, Yahoo! Groups, MSN Spaces, YouTube, eBaumsworld, Slashdot. It would affect Wikipedia if there wasn’t a special clause for non-commercial sites. Because many news sites (NYTimes, CNN, the Post) allow people to login and create profiles and comment, it might affect them too.

    Because it affects both libraries and schools, it will dramatically increase the digital divide. Poor youth only gain access to these sites through libraries and schools. With this ban, poor youth will have no access to the cultural artifacts of their day. Furthermore, because libraries won’t be able to maintain separate 18+ and minor computers, this legislation will affect everyone who uses libraries, including adults.

    This legislation is horrifying and culturally damaging. Please, all of you invested in social technologies, do something to make this stop.”

    doesn’t surprise me one bit – IMO yet another example of a worldwide lurch towards social conservatism and a regulated internet (now a distinct possibility following the succesful censorship/filtering by the Chinese working in tandem with US corporates, and corporate consolidation of ISPs meaning much net traffic is ultimately routed by a few large communications companies based in either the US or Asia)

    some states/nations can (and do) do this anyway by deploying filtering software.

    Even public sector organisations are perfectly within their right to do so by using a “free market” argument – claiming that that as they paid for the connection they can do as they please with the data running through it..

    General Lighting wrote:
    doesn’t surprise me one bit – IMO yet another example of a worldwide lurch towards social conservatism and a regulated internet (now a distinct possibility following the succesful censorship/filtering by the Chinese working in tandem with US corporates, and corporate consolidation of ISPs meaning much net traffic is ultimately routed by a few large communications companies based in either the US or Asia)

    some states/nations can (and do) do this anyway by deploying filtering software.

    Even public sector organisations are perfectly within their right to do so by using a “free market” argument – claiming that that as they paid for the connection they can do as they please with the data running through it..

    Indeed, it’s predictable and very unfortunate!

    Site wrote:
    Indeed, it’s predictable and very unfortunate!

    OTOH the “kids” will just have to stop dumbing themselves down, form real communities (not just on line ones) and learn a bit more about how computers and communications networks work!

    I don’t think ISP level censorship (at least not of social networks) will be seen in Western countries apart from maybe connections offered to family groups where there are young children..

    Between a bunch of teenagers or young people – even the poorer ones – they can easily obtain cheap PC’s etc and share a broadband or wireless connection, in the same way that many set up sound systems or find a friends house where they can hang out and play tunes, go on the net etc. its amazing what sort of stuff is put in skips or just given away (particularly with new environmental rules that an old computer is treated as hazardous scrap).

    OK they may need to learn a bit more about how the kit all fits together that gets you on line but its easier than it ever was…

    I think we’re moving towards heavy controls of the internet…

    Site wrote:
    I think we’re moving towards heavy controls of the internet…

    I do think on line media is going to be brought under similar regulatory framework to the conventional media – although it will probably be done more by creating a climate of “self-censorship”.

    People will intially be allowed to overstep the mark; then reined in by various means.

0

Voices

4

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Life Politics, Media & Current Events Proposed US ‘anti-social network’ legislation