Forums › Life › Politics, Media & Current Events › Biodiversity, Construction, Agriculture
Biodiversity, Construction, Agriculture
What in your opinion is Responsible for the greatest threat to Biodiversity, Construction or Agriculture?
Please let us all know of any other of your views on this subject matter!
dont forget industrie, surly industrie poses a threat to Bio-diversity!
So called Defence, is also a seriouse threat to Nature, Bio-diversity and Humanitie, with weapons of mass destruction like Nuclear Weapons and Biological weapons like Anthrax.
Both of these types of man made destructive weapons, could threatan to destroy much of life on Earth.
People like enviromentalist, often say that Agriculture is the main threat to Biodiversity!
I supose that it is a large threat. It is shocking to think that massive parts of the Rain Forrest are cleared for the soul purpose of growing soyer!
It is a shame that Countrys like Brazil and the Amazon, aspire to develop like those countrys of the west like America, without the Rain Forrests, much of life on earth would slowly become unsustainable.
Genetic Enginearing is also undoutedly a threat to Bio-Diversity and life on Earth.
With new geneticaly engineared organisams, comes the risk of of new phathogeanes and new strains of bacteria which could be a threat to particular organisams, including ourselfs and other eco systems.
Nuclear weapons are the biggest threat we’ve ever faced. They have the capacity to wipe the entire planet out in a flash so to speak and they’re becoming ever more widespread…
The Monsanto Produced Naparm and agent orange poses a seriouse threat to Bio-diversity.
It were such strong dioxines which were developed by USA millitary, during their invasion of Vietnam, which were indispicable used, in the purpose of anialating whole areas of Rain Forest, thus exposing villigies, servilians and Vietnam soldjures.
Sadly, many of the effects of agent orange and Naparm, are still felt today in Vietnam, from the repercusions of deformed babys from many cervilians who tried rearing famillys after the war, as there food, water air and human chromosomes had been toxicated from the spraying of these purposly developed herbiceides.
No doubt much of Vietnams biodiversity has also been effected geneticaly aswell from plants, birds and mamals.
One of the most controversial aspects of the of the U.S. military effort in South East Asia was the wide-spread use of herbicides between 1961 and 1971 . They were used to defoliate large parts of the countryside. These chemicals continue to change the landscape, cause diseases and birth defects, and poison the food chain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War
Early in the American military effort it was decided that, since PAVN/NLF were hiding their activities under triple-canopy jungle, a useful first step might be to defoliate certain areas. This was especially true of growth surrounding bases (both large and small) in what became known as Operation Ranch Hand. Corporations like Dow Chemical and Monsanto were given the task of developing herbicides for this purpose. The defoliants (which were distributed in drums marked with color-coded bands) included the Rainbow Herbicides Agent Pink, Agent Green, Agent Purple, Agent Blue, Agent White, and, most famously, the dioxin-contaminated Agent Orange. About 12 million gallons of Agent Orange were sprayed over South East Asia during the American involvement.
In 1961–1962, the Kennedy administration authorized the use of chemicals to destroy rice crops. Between 1961 and 1967, the U.S. Air Force sprayed 20 million U.S. gallons (76,000 m³) of concentrated herbicides over 6 million acres (24,000 km²) of crops and trees, affecting an estimated 13 percent of South Vietnam’s land. In 1997, an article published by The Wall Street Journal reported that up to half a million children were born with dioxin-related deformities, and that the birth defects in southern Vietnam were fourfold those in the north.[citation needed] A 1967 study by the Agronomy Section of the Japanese Science Council concluded that 3.8 million acres (15,000 km²) of foliage had been destroyed, possibly also leading to the deaths of 1,000 peasants and 13,000 pieces of livestock.
As of 2006, the Vietnamese government estimates that there are over 4,000,000 victims of dioxin poisoning in Vietnam, although the United States government denies any conclusive scientific links between Agent Orange and the Vietnamese victims of dioxin poisoning. In some areas of southern Vietnam dioxin levels remain at over 100 times the accepted international standard.[124]
The U.S. Veterans Administration has listed prostate cancer, respiratory cancers, multiple myeloma, type II diabetes, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, soft tissue sarcoma, chloracne, porphyria cutanea tarda, peripheral neuropathy, and spina bifida in children of veterans exposed to Agent Orange as possible side effects of their parent’s exposure to the herbicides.[citation needed] Although there has been much discussion over whether the use of these defoliants constituted a violation of the laws of war, it must be noted that the defoliants were not considered weapons, since exposure to them did not lead to immediate death or even incapacitation.
One of the most controversial aspects of the of the U.S. military effort in South East Asia was the wide-spread use of herbicides between 1961 and 1971 . They were used to defoliate large parts of the countryside. These chemicals continue to change the landscape, cause diseases and birth defects, and poison the food chain.
Herbicides still threaten Bio-Diversity today
Herbicides still threaten Bio-Diversity today, as well as Human health.
Despite this, many people rush out to buy the Monsanto manufactured Roundup and other strong dioxine based herbicide weed killers, to damage ecologies in there gardens for instance, which they them selfs dont evan understand or apreciate, as well as the possible risks of damage to there own health from damage to the thyroid glands, increased risks of cancer and damage to the reproductive system.
Despite such medical evidance though, many of these dangourse herbicide and pesticide chemicals like Glyphosphate, and round up are still sprayed by farmers. Much of the food we by from the super market is also contaminated by these chemicals, undoutedly, unless we can afford to by Organic, which is contrivershal and outragease.
Outragouse to is the fact that those comfy councilers we vote for, permit road sides, pathways, parks and childrens play areas to be sprayed with herbicides, as so I have been told, when inquireing why, the “Defra – Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs” permits them to!
They realy go for it in my home town of Dover, spraying every where, as if it werent enough with all the fumes and chemicals from near by industries, roads and fields.
Dover Council sprays the pencester park, council estates and evan outside their own district and town council officies.
I think, it is Always a wonderfull feeling, gaizing at old baron, abandond industrial waste lands!
It is amaizing how nature, wildlife and an whole ecology slowly, but surly creeps back in, from wildflower, butterflys, bees, wild birds and mamals!
Arnt We Lucky To Be ParT Of NaTuRe :weee:
humans are the biggest threat of all, we are the only creatures on earth who choose to disrupt the balance of the world
natural cycle – world warms up, world freezes up, world heats up again, we, as humans, just decide to speed up this natural cycle… however by speeding up things and not letting them run the correct course does it mean that the cycle ends and we are left with nothing?
just a thought…
Some scientists belive that the melting of the ice caps is not acturly dew to Global Warming coursed by CO2 emmissions but that the ice that is everdently melting now, is just the ice that was left over from the last ice age.
(The Gia Hypothisis).
This would mean that all that “Reduce CO2 Emissions” and tax and Pop artists jumping on the band wagon, was just another way of keeping us all in a limited an media controled reality and swindeling as much money out of people as possible.
Some of the worlds most corupt people, trying to sell Nuclear Power, which every one knows is not Safe, Clean, or Sustainable, see links;
http://www.partyvibe.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=13870
&
http://www.partyvibe.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=25246
The theory of the dinosours being made largly exticed by an enormouse meteorite, would supourt this theory, as with all the smoke which would have been realesed into the atmospheare, the sun would have been blocked out for long enough to have made many reptile dinosours extinct, because they relied on the suns raise of their ballanced enviromental ecological system, to sustaine their exsistants.
There is archilogical everdance of an ice age after the dinosourse predominated earth, and mamamls were, at that time, mainly nocturnal animals which may have eat fruit, nuts or posibly have scavenged. Wooly mamoths were about during the ice age, as well as probally many amphibiouse and aquatic creatures, of which where more suited to such cold conditions.
It is presumed that homosapiounes, evolved from cave men, and our nearest, closest ancestrol match is thought to be chimpanzees.
Another interesting site which supourts such a theory that Global Warming may be a hoax is the http://www.wnho.net/ which is well worth checking out with an open mind!
(The Gia Hypothisis).
it’s interesting that every single peer reviewed piece of research into climate change comes to the conclusion that human activity is contributing to climate change
there have been many ice ages in the planets history. ice cores go back 60 billion years. the last ice age was at it’s peak 18 thousand years ago. kind of scuppers the theory you’ve mentioned
0
Voices
10
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Life › Politics, Media & Current Events › Biodiversity, Construction, Agriculture