Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Pirate bay closes its UK proxy site

Forums Life Computers, Gadgets & Technology Pirate bay closes its UK proxy site

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • You will be redirected to this page if you try to access the proxy site, Pirate Party UK Proxy

    [h=2]BPI Legal Action[/h]The proxy server the Pirate Party UK initially provided in solidarity with other parties in Europe, but later as an anti-censorship resource for UK users, has now been been removed. Loz Kaye made the following statement:
    Elected members of the party’s National Executive Committee, along with the head of IT, received letters from lawyers acting for British Phonographic Industry (BPI), threatening them personally with High Court legal action.
    After seeking exhaustive advice, as well as attempts to open dialogue with the BPI, it has become clear that the law as it stands makes any decision to continue hosting the proxy impossible. This is not the outcome I wanted, however a challenge to this action from the BPI would make it financially impossible, even in light of recent fundraising efforts, to campaign actively in the way our members expect.
    We will be continuing to fight for digital rights, transparency and all the other issues that we care about.
    The Pirate Party UK would like to thank those people and organisations who offered support and assistance in the last few weeks and will of course offer to return any donations made since the 9th of December, we will be contacting donors individually from today.
    Please also see this statement from Frances Nash and Ralli Solicitors on our behalf.

    Well what the fuck do we do now…….. oh wait *sneezes* Download music, movies, games, software! The Pirate Bay – The galaxy’s most resilient BitTorrent site …..oh there ya go.raaa

    @thelog 512896 wrote:

    Well what the fuck do we do now……..

    “Find a different way to steal other people’s creations” is what most PB users will be doing. In my opinion.

    BPI thinks this will help boost music sales. Er… somehow I don’t see that happening.

    I buy all my music these days usually second hand CDs just didn’t seem right anymore.

    Yeah I had already found a way to COPY data from pirate bay when I wrote the tread, hence the second link I posted.

    Anyway, who said anything about stealing??? Surly to steal something you have to remove it from someone’s property or take it without the owners permission. As I say I am merely copying the data with the owner of that particular piece of datas permission. Not that I am saying copying data is against the copywright or anything, I just dislike it when people refer to a file sharing as stealing when nothing is being stolen.

    @thelog 512916 wrote:

    Anyway, who said anything about stealing??? Surly to steal something you have to remove it from someone’s property or take it without the owners permission. As I say I am merely copying the data with the owner of that particular piece of datas permission. Not that I am saying copying data is against the copywright or anything, I just dislike it when people refer to a file sharing as stealing when nothing is being stolen.

    I suggest you refer to the 1968 Theft Act. It might surprise you to learn that isn’t the case – what makes the theft is the commercial gain from obtaining goods or services without honouring the contracts that give access to them, OUTSIDE of your personal private or educational use.

    Theft Act 1968

    Sorry i’m blind, I cannot read that

    @Pat McDonald 512922 wrote:

    I suggest you refer to the 1968 Theft Act. It might surprise you to learn that isn’t the case – what makes the theft is the commercial gain from obtaining goods or services without honouring the contracts that give access to them, OUTSIDE of your personal private or educational use.

    Theft Act 1968

    I could just be being an idiot, but surely loggy, or anyone copying music data for private use only would then not fall subject to that?

    @Deezl 512947 wrote:

    I could just be being an idiot, but surely loggy, or anyone copying music data for private use only would then not fall subject to that?

    The bigger criminals would be those sharing the data (it would be much more difficult to to prove a data file on a computer came from stolen content, especially as the laws are being changed to permit safety backups of original data.

    it is stealing but more like Robin Hood stealing from the poor to give to the rich, and in the short term has successfully forced down prices of content to make it way more affordable and put power back in the hands of the consumer, but taken to extremes it can also end up like the Monty Python sketch where a somewhat incompetent highwayman eventually gets into a big pickle over wealth redistribution.

    I think the BPI’s idea is a shit one anyway, the progress of technology cannot be reversed. at the same time people can’t download music for free and then hope to end up becoming the next Tiësto or David Guetta or Armin Van Buuren. And I expect in 24 years time Fenna Van Buuren’s career will be something like a lawyer (her dad’s “real career”) or an accountant, and if she also follows in her fathers footsteps it will most likely be a second job or hobby for her…

    GL you seem to have David Guetta on the brain at the moment.

    Besides I don’t DL music, I mainly DL mixes or stream on soundcloud. But films and software……. I have borrowed a few over the years.

    The curious thing is DG is known mostly for who he is and not his music. I’m not even sure what genre he plays, I just see him as “chap with the hair who isn’t Steve Aoki”. Even Tiësto still produces better stuff but he is another one who is still stuck in the days of personality DJ’s, who perhaps understandably are trying to squeeze the last out of that scene until these big “EDM” events get fucked up by major safety/security incidents (its already happening such as the crush at the Telefonica Arena with about 4 dead, Loveparade 2010 etc, numerous disturbances at Dutch events).

    I was on trancefixion forum and there are now so many DJ’s and producers you cannot even keep track of them. Of course the music will continue but its increasingly becoming a larger number of folk chasing after a smaller pot of euros who increasingly are juggling their involvement in the music scene with normal day jobs. Even ID&T is reporting far less attendees and revenues at their events…

    Films and software are indeed often overpriced and a combination of piracy and DIY culture has pushed down the price of them, but its not a battle without collateral damage. The slow devaluing of the creative “industries” was already setting in before the Internet arrived but something which makes copyrights/protection essentially irrelevant as its near impossible to stop is obviously going to hit them even harder.

    Fun fact I learned this morning: copying some kind of copyrighted digital media from one storage medium to another is illegal. So, ripping your CD collection onto iTunes to put on your iPod? Illegal. Copying an eBook from your computer onto your Kindle? Illegal. Oops.

    Thankfully, that’s all set to change. The government’s laid out a new “ modern, robust and flexible copyright framework” to address the problem — the problem being that no one or their dog gives a rat’s arse about the current law. Their theory is, if the government are nice enough to change the law (a law I’m sure no one even knew existed), we might be so grateful that we stop breaking the laws we actually know about. Or something like that.

    Anyway, apparently this change, along with a few other more meaningful ones (like allowing schools to record TV programmes for “private study” and allowing greater use of copyrighted material, if it’s properly acknowledged) with generate £500 million for the UK economy over the next 10 years. And if that’s not an impressive conjuring trick, I don’t know what is. Still, at least I should be grateful that I’m no longer breaking the law by copying CDs, even if it’s not really going to change my day-to-day life one single jot. Now that we’ve done that, can we sort out the whole patent thing? Cheers.

    Crazy Fact: Ripping CDs is Illegal | Gizmodo UK

    That law has been disregarded since I was in junior school, it makes sense to remove it but claiming it will generate half a billion extra revenue for the UK is pure bullshit. The money is gone, so is the will to pay a premium price for content. Both those things are not coming back. In “payment” for the widespread exchange of much cheaper or even free content, people will just have to get used to music and arts being a second job or increasingly a hobby which covers its expenses (such as how the Dutch pirate stations are financed) rather than a mainstream career. This is already the case even on prestigious public funded radio and TV stations in Europe (I noticed this when I could pick up Dutch and Belgian radio on FM because of the tropo, and did some research into the stations, shows and presenters).

    Imo if music etc. becomes a hobby / second job it will hopefuly mean that we will get a lot more musicians who become musicians for their passion for music (like a lot of the free party scene i guess) rather then to make a quick buck.
    Thats what i’m hoping, whether it’ll actually happen or not..

    I used to like the old copyright notices on vidos that specifically mentioned that it couldn’t be viewed publicly on “oils rigs, schools, coaches”….

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]152527[/ATTACH]

0

Voices

17

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Life Computers, Gadgets & Technology Pirate bay closes its UK proxy site