Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

truth about "radioactive" cigarettes?

Forums Drugs Cigarettes, Smoking & Tobacco truth about "radioactive" cigarettes?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • I saw a few years ago various videos claiming that some cigarettes were “radioactive” because sections glowed under a black light (filtered UV light that is not harmful to look at with the naked eye) whereas others did not.

    Fluorescence is often confused with radioactivity due to the use of phosphorescent materials based on tritium in watch dials etc that do contain a small amount of radioactive material. These things glow in a similar fashion to some objects placed under the black light – but it is not a detector of radioactivity. To confuse matters further many scientists do use UV-fluorescent material as a marker in place of radioactive substances as its safer!

    I had to hand a blacklight CFL in a desk lamp fitting and remembered to save the last cigarette from a packet of a different brand so I had two types to compare – top is JPS Black (Imperial Tobacco) and bottom is Rothmans Royals Red (BAT).

    Both have the glowing sections around roughly the same parts of the cig – I suspect that they are likely to be whatever chemical is put in the cigarette papers to try and prevent fires being set by an unattended cigarette (if it was some additive in the tobacco roll then surely the whole of the cigarette would glow?).

    Would be interesting to see what the smokers in other countries see (even before the trend towards “additive free” brands British cigarettes have traditionally contained more Virginia tobacco and less additives than those smoked overseas)

    [IMG]https://www.partyvibe.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=155396&d=1467408863[/IMG]

    Looks brighter on one of them, wonder why that is?

    looks like it is indeed the fire safe material (two different types of paper with different burn rates) – the differences in light values are most likely caused by variations in paper used across brands and the limitation of photographing anything under UV light with a mobile phone camera (I had to tweak the exposure levels otherwise the whole shot was way overexposed).

    that said even in the 1980s and before when way more people smoked everyone was taught that smoking in bed and/or when drunk was unwise; and especially at work smokers are increasingly banished to outside or far corners of buildings where the concept of a “leisurely smoke” is long gone..

    [IMG]https://www.partyvibe.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=155398&d=1467499951[/IMG]

    Wasn’t aware that these had been implemented yet. Looks cool as fuck though I think.

0

Voices

2

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Drugs Cigarettes, Smoking & Tobacco truth about "radioactive" cigarettes?