freind getting an asbo…… a mates just been told hes got to meet with police tomorrow over a party he threw the other month in order to arrange another time to issue an asbo. they said theyll also be wanting the names of any other organisers and to have a look at the system in order to identify it, although theyve already said they cant conficate anything.
anyone got any expirience with asbos?? im guessing hes got a right to legal advice and a lawer?
will he be able to put a case foward rather than just accept what they give him, maybe to relax the rules a little??
can they stop him from going to parties as long as he isnt involved with organisation??
UK : East : Pepper spray canister discharged by chavs in Norwich ASDA! A Norwich supermarket will reopen today after yesterday's chemical incident which led to more than 300 people being evacuated.
The Asda store on Drayton High Road, Hellesdon, was closed at just after 3pm yesterday after customers complained of feeling unwell in the store. Two local men in their 20s were arrested in connection with the incident.
The police were called and fire crews and ambulance crews also attended the incident with a number of people being treated by paramedics for breathing difficulties. In total 28 people were treated at the scene.
Shoppers were evacuated to the nearby Esporta sports complex and Express Holiday Inn hotel while investigations are carried out into the cause of the leak.
A spokeswoman for Norfolk police said: “Police were called at 3.12pm to reports of people feeling unwell after being exposed to what we now believe to be pepper spray. The store was evacuated immediately as a safety precaution.”
Chief Superintendent Jo Shiner said: “Norfolk Constabulary in conjunction with the other emergency services dealt with this incident swiftly.”
The store closure meant traffic nearby was heavier than usual with Sweet Briar Road and Drayton High Road particularly badly affected.
Gas attack store reopens - Norfolk News - EDP24
UK : LDN : Form 696 now officially targeted against urban music events unfortunately the Met have been smart here, they have enough power to deliberately pick an initially extreme position (targeting all music events) and have now used all their databases and incident logs to confirm that certain kinds of music "may lead to problems"...
Police say evidence shows trouble is most likely at music events when DJs or MCs perform to a live backing track at late-night clubs.
"Detailed research identified which events are most likely to attract crime and disorder," a spokeswoman for the Metropolitan Police told BBC News.
"At the end of the day, you've got to say that certain events attract more trouble than others.
"We're shifting the focus away from live music. Originally the definition of what Form 696 applied to was extremely broad so by narrowing it down, it's thought that we can better tailor it to our requirements."
BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Police target hip-hop nightclubs
UK : LDN (W) : Stone roses Ian Brown arrested for domestic violence "I'm standing alone
You're weighing the gold
I'm watching you sinking......."
Former Stone Roses singer Ian Brown has been arrested on suspicion of assaulting his wife at a house in West Kensington, London.
Mr Brown, 46, was arrested after police were called on Monday morning to reports of a disturbance.
"On arrival, a 37-year-old woman made an allegation of domestic assault," a Scotland Yard spokeswoman said.
He was taken to a west London police station and was bailed to return in December pending further inquiries.
UK : LDN : Growing distance between the Met and Public well given that they tend to go around hitting people with sticks or even shooting at them, its hardly surprising IMO..
There is a "growing distance" between the Metropolitan Police and the public, the chief commissioner has admitted
BBC NEWS | UK | England | London | 'Distance' between Met and public
More evidence that the Old Bill are full of cunts check this video out:
Video: Arrested for asking a policeman for his badge number | Environment | guardian.co.uk
basically this woman belongs to a group that monitors police activities and so get them out the way the police use excessive force......fucking cunts123
UK : SE : Thames Valley Police hunt rave thugs not quite the story you'd expect from TVP!!! not sure if the rave was legal or illegal (perhaps it was done with TENS or similar) but fair play to the cops for actually investigating the real criminals...
its a shame this happened at all I lived in that area for many years and incidents like this following a rave would have been unheard of just 5 years ago....
Robberies and assault – Playhatch
Friday 14 August 2009, 1:22pm
Thames Valley Police is appealing for witnesses after two robberies and an assault in the Henley area.
In the early hours of Sunday morning (9/8), a group of between 60 and 70 people were at a rave by the lakes near Caversham Marina, just off the Henley Road between Caversham and Playhatch.
Det Sgt Alun Watkins, investigating the incidents, said: “Although there was no trouble at the rave, soon after it finished there were two robberies and an assault.
“I believe that the offenders probably weren’t at the rave but used this as an opportunity to target those who had been and might have been vulnerable at this time in the morning.”
Just after 2am, a 22-year-old man was near to Berrybrook Garden Centre in Henley Road, when a group of men came up and attacked him. He sustained a fractured jaw and was taken to the Royal Berkshire Hospital for treatment. During the attack, the man also had his wallet and mobile phone stolen.
At 4.20am in the Henley Road, Playhatch, two 18-year-old men were walking home when a group of around six to eight men assaulted one of them. He was hit on the head and had his mobile phone, a Mandarina Duck, stolen.
A couple of moments later the other 18-year-old was punched in the face by one of the group and had his wallet stolen.
The offenders are all white and most were wearing white hooded tops. They are in their late teens to early twenties.One of the men was described as being very tall, around 6ft 6ins.
Det Sgt Watkins added: “I believe that these men are local men as they seem to have good knowledge of the area.
“The Mandarina Duck mobile phone that was stolen is quite distinctive. It is green and although not expensive, it is quite rare.
“There were lots of people at the rave who might have some information to help with the investigation and I urge anyone who might have seen these incidents, or any suspicious activity in the area, to contact me.”
Anyone with any information about the incident should contact Det Sgt Watkins at Thame police station via 0845 8 505 505, or if you don’t want to talk to the police or give your name, call the Crimestoppers charity on 0800 555 111.
What am i looking at? Am getting done for possession with intent to supply, i got caught with 70 pills on me and my mate said half was his and because i was going to hand them to him its possession with intent to supply instantly...
Anyhow, its my 1st offence and my girlfriend is pregnant (just foudn out like 2 weeks ago) am in crown court on 14th August n to be honest am shittin myself, dont wanna let my girl down either by bein locked up
Am also on a training course at the moment doin wall & floor tiling which is going really well and if i do get locked up its just gunna fuck it all up
Anyway, question is... what u guys think will happen to me???12
NO COMMENT – THE DEFENDANT’S GUIDE TO ARREST
NO COMMENT - THE DEFENDANT'S GUIDE TO ARREST
If you think you might one day run the risk of being arrested, you must find out what to do in that situation. If prison, fines, "community service", etc don't appeal to you, by following this advice you can massively reduce the risk of all three. In the police station, the cops rely on people's naivety. Wise Up.
When you have been arrested:
You have to give the police your name, address and date of birth. They also have the right to take your fingerprints, photo and non-intimate body samples. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 has now removed the traditional "right to silence". However, all this means is that the police/prosecution can point out your refusal to speak to them, when the case comes to court, and the court may take this as evidence of your guilt. The police cannot force you to speak or to give a statement, whatever they may say to you in the station. Refusing to speak cannot be used to convict you by itself. It's yet to be seen how the police will use this change in the law, but we reckon the best policy if you want to get off is remain silent. The best place to work out a good defense is afterwards, with your solicitor or witnesses, not under pressure in the hands of the cops. If your refusal to speak comes up in court, the best defense we think is to refuse to speak until your solicitor gets there, then get them to agree to your position. You can then say you acted on legal advice. Keeping silent is still the best thing to do in police custody.
Q: What happens when I get arrested?
When you are arrested, you will be taken to a police station. You will be asked your name, address and date of birth. Your personal belongings will be taken from you. These are listed on the custody record and usually you will be asked to sign that the list is correct. You should sign immeciately below the last item, so that the cops can't add something incriminating to the list. You should also refuse to sign for something which isn't yours, or which could be incriminating. You will then be placed in a cell until the police are ready to deal with you.
Q: When can I contact a solicitor?
You should be able to ring a solicitor as soon as you've been arrested. Once at the police station it is one of the first things you should do, for two reasons:
To have someone know where you are
To show the cops you are not going to be a soft target; they may back off a bit
It is advisable to avoid using the duty solicitor as they are often either crap or hand in glove with the cops. It's worth finding the number of a good solicitor in your area and memorising it. The police are wary of decent solicitors. Also, avoid telling your solicitor exactly what happened; this can be sorted out later. For the time being, tell them you are refusing to speak. Your solicitor can come into the police station while the police interview you: you should refuse to be interviewed unless your solicitor is present.
Q: What is an interview?
An interview is the police questioning you about the offences they want to charge you with. The interview will usually take place in an interview room in the police station. An interview is only of benefit to the police. Remember they want to prosecute you for whatever charges they can stick on you. An interview is a no-win situation. For your benefit, the only thing to be said in an interview is "No Comment". Remember, they cannot legally force you to speak.
Q: Why do the police want me to answer questions?
If the police think they have enough evidence against you they will not need to interview you. In most public order arrests they rely on witness statements from 1 or 2 cops or bystanders, you won't even be interviewed.
The police want to convict as many people as possible because:
They want to convict you to make it look like they're doing a good job at solving crime. The "clear up rate" is very important to the cops, they have to be seen to be doing their job. The more crimes they get convictions for, the better it looks for them.
Police officers want promotion, to climb up the ladder of hierarchy. Coppers get promotion through the number of crimes they "solve". No copper wants to be a bobby all their life.
A "solved" crime is a conviction against somebody. You only have to look at such cases as the Birmingham Six to understand how far the police will go to get a conviction. Fitting people up to boost the "clear up rate", and at the same time removing people the cops don't like, is a widespread part of all police forces.
Q: So if the police want to interview me, it shows I could be in a good position?
Yes - they may not have enough evidence, and hope you'll implicate yourself or other people. And the easy way to stay in that good position is to refuse to be drawn into a conversation and answer "No Comment" to any questions.
Q: But what if the evidence looks like they have got something on me? Wouldn't it be best to explain away the circumstances I was arrested in, so they'll let me go?
The only evidence that matters is the evidence presented in court to the magistrate or judge. The only place to explain everything is in court. If they've decided to keep you in, no amount of explaining will get you out. If the police have enough evidence, anything you say can only add to the evidence against you. When the cops interview someone, they do all they can to confuse and intimidate you. The questions may not be related to the crime. Their aim is to soften you up, get you chatting. Don't answer a few small talk questions and them clam up when they ask you a question about the crime, it looks worse in court. To prosecute you, the police must present their evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service. A copy of the evidence will be sent to your solicitor. The evidence usually rests on very small points: this is why it's important not to give anything away in custody. If they don't have enough evidence the case could be thrown out of court or never even get to court. This is why they want you to speak. they need all the evidence they can get. One word could cause you a lot of trouble.
Q: So I've got to keep my mouth shut. What tricks can I expect the police to pull in order to make me talk?
The police try to get people to talk in many devious ways. The following are some pretty good examples, but remember they may try some other line on you.
THESE ARE THINGS THAT OFTEN CATCH PEOPLE OUT. DON'T GET CAUGHT OUT.
"Come on now, we know it's you, your mate's in the next cell and he's told us the whole story"
If they've got the story, why do they need your confession? Playing co-accused off against each other is a common trick as you have no way of checking what another person is saying. If you are up to something dodgy with other people, work out a story and stick to it. Plus you can't be convicted just on the word of a co-accused.
"We know it's not you, but we know you know who's done it. Come on Jane, don't be silly, tell us who did it"
The cops will use your first name to try and seem as though they're your friends. If you are young they will act in a fatherly/motherly way, etc.
"As soon as we find out what happened you can go"
Fat chance!
"Look you little bastard, don't fuck us about. We've dealt with some characters, a little runt like you is nothing to us. We know you did it, you little shit, and you're going to tell us"
"What's a nice kid like you doing messed up in a thing like this?"
They're trying to get at you.
"We'll keep you in until you tell us"
Unless they charge you for a "serious offence" they have to release you within 24 hours. Even if you are suspected of a "serious offence" you have the right to a solicitor after 36 hours, and only a magistrate can order you to be held without charge for longer.
"You'll be charged with something far more serious if you don't answer our questions, sonny. You're for the high jump. You're not going to see the light of day for a long time. Start answering our questions cos we're getting sick of you"
Mental intimidation. They're unlikely to charge you with a serious charge that won't stick in court. Don't panic.
"My niece is a bit of a rebel"
"If someone's granny gets mugged tonight it'll be your fault. Stop wasting our time by not talking"
They're trying to make you feel guilty. Don't fall for it - did you ask to be nicked and interviewed?
Mr Nice: "Hiya, what's it all about then? Sergeant Smith says you're in a bit of trouble. He's a bit wound up with you. You tell me what happened and Smith won't bother you. He's not the best of our officers, he loses his rag every now and again. So what happened?"
Mr Nice is a devious as Mr Nasty. He or she will offer you cigarettes, a cuppa, a blanket. It's the softly-softly approach. It's bollocks. "No Comment".
"We've been here for half an hour now and you've not said a fucking word ... look you little cunt, some of the CID boys will be down in a minute, they'll have you talking in no time. Talk now or I'll bring them in"
Keep at it , they're getting desperate. They're about to give up. You've a lot to lose by speaking.
"Your girlfriend's outside. Do you want us to arrest her? We'll soon have her gear off for a strip search. I bet she'll tell us. You're making all this happen by being such a prick. Now talk."
They pick on your weak spots, family, friends, etc. Gerry Conlon of the Guildford Four was told that his mother would be shot by the RUC unless he confessed. Cops do sometimes victimise prisoner's families, but mostly they are bluffing.
"You're a fucking loony. Who'd want you for a mother, you daft bitch? Confess or your kids are going into care"
"Look, we've tried to contact your solicitor, but we can't get hold of them. It's going to drag on for ages this way. Why don't you use one of our duty solicitors, and we'll soon get the situation cleared up so you can go home"
Never accept an interview without your solicitor present, and don't make a statement even if your solicitor advises you to - a good one won't.
"You're obviously no dummy. I'll tell you what, we'll do a deal. You admit to one of the charges, and we'll recommend to the judge that you get a non-custodial sentence, because you've co-operated. How does that sound?"
They're trying to get you to do a deal. There are no deals to be made with the police. This bloke got sent down for not paying a fine. The prisoner he was handcuffed to in the prison bus did a deal with the police. He pleaded guilty to a charge after being promised a non-custodial sentence. The man trusted the police, he was a smalltime businessman accused of fraud. When it came to court, the judge gave him 2 years. The bloke was speechless!
"We've been round to the address you gave us and the people there say they don't know you. We've checked up on the DSS computer and there's no sign of you. Now come on, tell us who you are. Wasting police time is a very serious offence. Now tell us who you are or you've had it"
If you've sorted out a false address with someone make sure they're reliable, and everyone in the place knows the name you're using. Stick at it, if you're confident. You can't be charged for wasting police time for not answering questions.
"They've abolished the right to silence - you have to tell us everything now, it's the law"
As we said at the beginning, you can still say nothing. There is no obligation to tell the cops anything beyond your name, address and date of birth.
If you are nicked on very serious charges, or for serious violence to a police officer, the cops may rough you up, or use violence and torture to get a confession (true or false) out of you. Many of the people freed after being fitted up by the West Midlands Serious Crimes Squad, or coming to light now in Manchester, were physically abused till they admitted to things they hadn't done. If this happens, obviously it's your decision to speak rather than face serious injury, but remember, what you say could land you inside for a long time, even if it's not true. Don't rely on retracting a confession in court - it's hard to back down once you've said something.
In the police station the cops rely on people's naivety. If you are sussed the chances are they'll give up on you. In these examples we have tried to show how they'll needle you to speak. That's why you have to know what to do when you're arrested. The hassle in the copshop isn't nice, but if you are on the ball, you can get off. You have to be prepared. We've had a lot of experience of the police and we simply say:
Keep calm and cool when you are arrested. (Remember you are on their home ground).
Get a solicitor.
Never make a statement.
Don't get drawn into conversations with the police.
If they rough you up, see a doctor immediately after being released. Get a written report of all bruising and marking. Remember the officer's names and numbers if possible.
Having said nothing in the police station, you can then look at the evidence and work out your alibi, your side of the story. This is how you will get off.
Remember:
An interview is a no-win situation. You are not obliged to speak.
If the police want to interview you, it shows you're in a good position.
The only way to stay in that position is to refuse to be drawn into any conversation and answer "No Comment" to any questions.
Q: What can I do if one of my friends or family has been arrested?
If someone you know is arrested, there's a lot you can do to help them from the outside:
If you know what name they are using - as soon as you think they've been arrested, ring the police station. Ask whether they are being held there and on what charges.
Inform a decent solicitor.
Remove anything from the arrested person's house that the police may find interesting: letters, address books, false IDs, etc in case the police raid the house.
Take food, cigarettes, etc into the police station for your arrested friend, but DON'T go into the police station to enquire about a prisoner if you run the risk of being arrested yourself.
The police have been known to lay off a prisoner if they have visible support from outside. It's solidarity which keeps prisoners in good spirits.
This information taken from a pamphlet by London Anarchist Black Cross 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3XX.
A guide to the Criminal Justice Act of 1994 A guide to the Criminal Justice Act of 1994
A copy of the entire Act can be bought from HMSO office or your local library should have a copy.
Sections 61 & 62: Trespassers on land
Two or more persons trespassing on land (not including public highway land, eg verges & lay-bys) with the intention of living there may be directed to leave the land by the police if: (a) there are 6 or more vehicles there; or (b) if any damage has been caused to the land, eg crop damage); or (c) 'threatening or abusive words or behaviour' have been used against the occupier or their agents. Not leaving as soon as reasonably practicable is an offence; as is returning to the land within 3 months; the maximum sentence is 3 months in prison and/or a £2,500 fine. The police are also given powers to seize vehicles.
Sections 63, 64 & 65: Raves
A 'rave' is defined as a gathering of 100+ people, at which amplified music ('wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats'[!) is played which is likely to cause serious distress to the local community, in the open air and at night. These sections give the police the power to order people to leave the land if they're believed to be preparing to hold a rave (2 or more people); waiting for a rave to start (10+); actually attending a rave (10+). Ignoring this direction, or returning to the land within the next week, are both offences, liable to 3 months' imprisonment and/or a £2,500 fine. Section 65 lets any uniformed constable who believes a person is on their way to a rave within a 5-mile radius to stop them and direct them away from the area - failure to comply can lead to a maximum fine of £1000.Sections 66 & 67: Seizure
The arrangements authorising police officers to enter land where a rave is in progress or anticipated. and which allow for the seizure, retention and charges for the confiscation of vehicles and sound equipment.
Section 68 & 69: Disruptive Trespassers
These refer to the new offence of 'aggravated trespass'. Section 68 is committed by anyone trespassing on land in the open air (not including highways and roads) with the intent of intimidating other people engaged in 'lawful activity' on that land or adjoining land, so as to deter them, or obstructing/ disrupting them. Section 69 gives the police sort of preventative powers to direct people to leave land. This direction can be made by a senior officer as long as at least one person is committing or intends to commit aggravated trespass, or there are two or more people present with the 'common purpose' of aggravated trespass. Failure to comply with this direction carries a maximum penalty of 3 months in prison and/or a 2,500 fine.
Sections 70 & 71: Trespassory Assemblies
As an amendment to the Public Order Act of 1986, this part allows the police to apply to the local authority (or, in London, the Home Secretary) to prohibit 'trespassory assemblies' of 20+ people for up to 4 days with a 5-mile exclusion zone, as long as there is a risk of 'serious disruption to the local community', or of 'significant damage' to the land or buildings/ monuments on it which may have historical/ archaeological/ scientific importance. Anyone organising or inciting another to attend one of these may be arrested and imprisoned for up to three months. Attendance, and refusal to be directed away, is punished by arrest and a maximum fine of 1000.
Sections 72, 73 & 74: Squatters - and Protected Intended Occupiers
These mean changes to section 6 of the Criminal Law Act of 1977, and apply only to residential property. DROs ('displaced residential occupiers', an extremely rare phenomenon!) and PIOs ( 'protected intended occupiers') - or others who can prove that they are acting on behalf of them - are made exempt from the protection previously given squatters and are permitted to use violence to secure entry. It becomes an offence not to leave premises when requested to by a PIO or DRO, liable to 6 months' imprisonment and/or a fine of 5000. Section 74 introduces a new offence of deliberately or recklessly making a false statement to claim PIO status. The definition of a PIO has been extended slightly.
Sections 75 & 76: Interim Possession Orders
These sections introduce a new 'faster' way of evicting squatters. Once an IPO (interim possession order) has been granted by a court and all the legal procedures have been correctly followed, the 'squatters' must leave within 24 hours of its service. It covers any person who is there when the Order is served and even those who arrive afterwards - failing to leave or returning within one year are both offences. The maximum penalty is 6 months in prison and/or a 5000 fine. Similarly to above, section 75 makes it an offence for the owner to make a false or misleading statement to obtain an IPO.
Sections 77, 78 & 79: Unauthorised Campers
'Unauthorised campers' are people residing in a vehicle or vehicles on any part of the highway or any other land in the open air without permission of the owner. Section 77 gives the local council the authority to direct an unauthorised camper to leave the land and remove all vehicles. It becomes an offence to not leave the land and remove all vehicles/ property 'as soon as reasonably practicable' or to re-enter the land within 3 months, liable to a fine of up to 1000. A magistrates' court can make an order under section 78 which allows the local council to take 'reasonable steps' to ensure the removal of a vehicle and any person residing within it. Another new offence is the wilful obstruction of anyone engaged in the removal - maximum fine of 1000.
Section 80: Caravan Sites Act
The Caravan Sites Act of 1968 included a duty of local authorities to provide gypsy sites in their areas. Most local authorities never got anywhere near full, decent levels of provision, but section 80 repeals that duty, so leaving travellers with nowhere legal to stop.
Section 154: Intentional Harassment, Alarm or Distress
This section inserts a new section 4(a) into the Public Order Act of 1986. Designed for incidents of racial harassment, its definition means it has much wider potential uses, whether against football fans or peaceful protestors, both of whom is has already been used against. It becomes an offence to intentionally either (a) use 'threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour, or disorderly behaviour'; or (b) display 'any writing, sign or visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting'; to cause someone 'harassment, alarm or distress'. The maximum penalty is 6 months in prison and/or a fine of 5000.
Section 82: Possession of Articles or Information Useful to Terrorists
This section is to be inserted into the 1989 Prevention of Terrorism Act as a new Part IVa of that Act. Besides the offence of possessing articles 'giving rise to a reasonable suspicion' that they are to be used for terroristic reasons; it also becomes an offence to collect, record or simply possess 'any information which is of such a nature as is likely to be useful to terrorists in planning or carrying out any act of terrorism...' The information is described as that 'not in the public domain' but journalists, peace campaigners and other researchers regularly use such information in the course of their work. The burden of proof lies on the accused to show that they had 'reasonable excuse' or 'lawful authority' to hold the information. Conviction can mean a prison sentence of up to 10 years and/or a fine.
Other police powers, in less detail-Right to Silence
Up till now, anyone arrested has had the right to remain silent in police custody - a precious safeguard of a legal system based on the premise that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Now, a jury can 'draw adverse inference' from the accused's relying on evidence not mentioned to the police at the time of arrest.
Increased Stop & Search Powers
Similar to the old 'sus' laws, these give the police increased powers to declare areas as 'stop & search zones' because they anticipate that 'serious incidents of violence' may take place. A direction can be made to cover an area for up to 24 hours, with possible 6 hour extension. The police are then able to stop and question people at random, as well as searching vehicles, pedestrians and any bags for weapons and dangerous articles, without even suspecting that those people have committed an offence or intend to. This is bound to affect young people from ethnic minorities who are much more likely to be stopped and searched than a white person.
Intimate Samples
The CJA introduces the compulsory taking of 'intimate and non-intimate' samples (such as hair, saliva, skin, pubic hair, hair, blood, urine, semen - 'reasonable force' may be used in cases of non-cooperation!) from anyone charged with a 'recordable offence' (some of these are relatively minor offences and the samples are not for use in the case). These samples will instead be used for a national DNA database.
Prisons
Privately-run prisons, unaccountable to public scrutiny and run on a profit-making basis, and due to be introduced, along with prison ships and 'secure training centres' for children aged 12 to 14. These young inmates can be strip-searched forcibly by a single member of staff; all their mail can be read and censored; all family visits can be stopped on the order of the Centre's Director...
Bail conditions
Changes to the Police & Magistrates' Act mean that the police will often be able to set bail conditions themselves without resorting to a magistrate in a court. This makes ultra-restrictive bail conditions much more likely.
DISCLAIMER:
The information contained on this page is intended for reference only and may become out of date. If you think you may be in trouble, please do not use this page as your only source of information, consult a solicitor.
Anyone had this? I've been getting cold calls from people claiming to represent the Debt Advice Bureau. The callers are from an Indian call centre and it's becoming a real pain in the arse.
They phone up and tell me about a government sponsored deal in which i can have all my unsecured debt wiped clean. I tell them i am happy with my current repayment plan but that doesn't stop em, oh no, they then gibber on and on and on and then gibber some more.
I have since found out it is a scam so the next time they ring me i shall tell them i am going to get my details and then activate a very powerful rape alarm (it's fucking well loud) down the phone and destroy the scammy cunts ear drums. I shall do this for every single scammer who rings me trying to sell me this scheme.
Bit harsh i know but if i can deafen them all then hopefull they won't be able to inflict this misery on anyone else.
Has anyone had any similar calls? They say they can wipe your unsecure debts clean using a newly formed government scheme. It's a load of fucking donkey nuts.
Grrrrrrrrrr! :crazy_diz
G20 public survey… Did anyone see the survey results on channel 4 news last night. People were asked whether the behaviour of the police at G20 was reasonable (or something like that)
the results were
46% - yes
45% - no
9% - don't no
shocking! A man died ffs! :hopeless:
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.YesNoPrivacy policy
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.Revoke cookies
