Gazza got it. Arsenal. Such a horrible word.
Hi All,
Just my take on things here but i think they just want to sell off and contract all government run organisations ..1 it wont cost them …2 when it all goes wrong they blame the company and put another company in charge . And three and what this is all driven by !!! , it makes money for big companies and share holders . We suffer and get a shit service and the rich get richer and can afford to pay private for a better service . Welcome to master and servant ……land lords and tennats and not before long work houses ….sound familiar !!!!! …..check your history !!!!
regards
Mungo
@GiantMidget 445800 wrote:
Gazza got it. Arsenal. Such a horrible word.
go me! Ohhhhhh yeaaaaaa
NHS is fucked because of the pharmaceutical companies and the companies that supply everything that is used daily in the hospitals.
Mates are nurses and they have to be super careful about opening bandages and shit cos they cost the earth.
Simple things like tubes and stuff. That tiny little vial of something just cost gazzilions even though maybe only half was used and the rest has to be thrown away.
Also they are buying in waaaaaaaaaaay expensive food as it has to be through the supplier rather than someone having the power to order from a normal supermarket. (Things like bread and pasta for example)
The NHS COULD save so much money with more effective management. But they have clueless people making some really strange financial decisions and are getting ripped off at the same time.
Free heathcare for all is one thing that is essential. Too many people might not seek the help they need as they might not get any help financially from the government, but be earning minimum wage with a family and just not have the money for the doctors.
Here it costs me £20 to visit the doctor. Yep it went up in Jan from 15 quid to 20 (equivalent).
I know that I didn’t go to the doc when I needed to when it was 15… sorta held on and saved up all my complaints so that when I went it was like for 6 or so things!
The less painful thing is though that once you get to 90 quid all visits within a year of your first payment is free. Still pissy though if you dont earn much money and you know you only go a few times. Great for people who are really sick though and will need lots of treatment over a long time.
I hope that GP visits remain free in the UK.
this may be a stupid question but what is NHS stand for?
NHS stands for “national health service”. in the UK and most other European countries, healthcare is free at source or subsidised – even where they do charge for doctors visits in some European nations its a fraction of the cost someone in the USA (or their medicare fund) would pay.
What happens in Europe is instead of people having to get individual medicare funds, a proportion of taxes that you pay on household goods, cars and fuel etc is spent on public healthcare everyone is entitled to use when they need it.
@kiwifruit 445885 wrote:
Also they are buying in waaaaaaaaaaay expensive food as it has to be through the supplier rather than someone having the power to order from a normal supermarket. (Things like bread and pasta for example)
The NHS COULD save so much money with more effective management. But they have clueless people making some really strange financial decisions and are getting ripped off at the same time.
when I worked in public sector finance (for another Govt department rather than the NHS), what I noticed is they made demands on suppliers for loads of lengthy paperwork and documents – without which they didn’t get the business. so this naturally favoured the big suppliers with the extra staff to do the paperwork – which of course pushes up the prices of the delivered goods.
Also if they directly employed people to do things like maintenance, IT work etc rather than outsourced it would work out cheaper in the long run…
@JustAnotherDarren 445572 wrote:
Ahh, what does that make my dad then?
2 years ago he said this goverment’s making the country go tits up, and he packed his bags.. stopped paying taxes and moved to singapore!MORE importantly,
Looks like i’m a tory then :S..
As one of the best health care’s in the world is France, although they do charge they charge very little..
it means a lot of people, like those people obsessed with thinking there always ill, forgotten the name obviously.. won’t go and waste a GP’s time. Instead they make a small fee for seeing the doctor, a small fee for the medicines, unless of course they are over a certain amount (around£35-50) where the goverment help you pay!
This seems a lot better, means everyone gets healthcare when you need it.. you don’t get people abusing the free system, but you don’t get the rich people best off. They can still go to private healthcare..?
Well actually you do get ppl abusing the system in France : your right to the extent that the poorest actually don’t pay a thing. Of course the more money you earn the less exempt you are. How it works : you pay a portion of the actual fees, the rest is footed by the govt (it’s called “la Securite Sociale”). In fact it is like the NHS : the only difference is that you have far fewer incompetent ppl. Those interested do long medical studies and are invested in their work.
@extraslim 445579 wrote:
I would think it unlikely that hypochondriacs are the major burden on the NHS. And for some people 35-50 pounds is an awful lot of money. I was seeing the doctor once a week at some points in my life. Free at point of use is an important principle that should not be lost unless there is no other way.
From my point of view it should be a god given right : LIFE IS IMPORTANT : it is being more and more considerd as a commodity. Look at the pharmaceutical industry : their focus is on profits not on whether medication works or not (some do, some don’t, some kill). From my point of view profits in the “industry” of health should be illegal!!
@FrenchTekno 445902 wrote:
From my point of view it should be a god given right : LIFE IS IMPORTANT : it is being more and more considerd as a commodity. Look at the pharmaceutical industry : their focus is on profits not on whether medication works or not (some do, some don’t, some kill). From my point of view profits in the “industry” of health should be illegal!!
From my point of view its not a right its an amazing privilege that most of the world do not have and that we should fight to keep for as long as possible. The pharmaceutical industry needs to be run as a business if it is to be effective, its not some super ethical hippy commune. Have you any idea how much it costs to develop a new drug? Our whole economy is based on a profit model, I know people seem to find this hard to swallow but peoples greed/desire for profit is what runs this country. I admit sometimes it can be a bitter pill to swallow but hell even being able to worry about the ethics side rather than your attention being focused on your next meal or your health complaints is a luxury afford from the very model people seem to dislike.
Least thats what I think 🙂
PS and to say “their focus is on profits not on whether medication works or not” makes no sense, if a medication works it leads to profit, if it doesn’t it is just lost money. They have rather a vested interest in the medication working.
Medicine and health care is too important to be run by profit hunters. Free health care and medicine is a basic human right in my world.
Hi !sinner69! ,
Very good point mate and to right …..health and education ….public transport ….gas , electric and water all should be state run . Else the greedy private companies max their profits and reduce service and its the customer that suffers !!! .
regards
Mungo
public utilities worked perfectly well when we were younger. Its also untrue that they didn’t provide fair profit for private business – it just worked differently, for instance the Post Office designed a telephone and said what bits they wanted, and then private companies could compete for the contracts to make the various bits of the phone. So you could have a handset from Plessey, a dial from Pye in Cambridge and other bits from Wales and they would all work in any phone made to that design. This way the private companies got a fairer share of the work, the equipment was robust and good quality, and most of it remained in the native country where the public utility operated.
this worked well enough until the 1980s (especially in continental European nations where trade unions and companies had a less adversarial relationship) but unfortunately both people in the UK and Europe voted it away hoping for short term gains on the “free market”. Now we are dependent on stuff from hundreds of miles away and our utilities are just all call centres competing with one another whilst service quality declines.
kung fu got it, riot!
@JustAnotherDarren 445552 wrote:
I don’t think i quite get it,To me that just seems like what Barcelona FC (football team) did..?Look how well it does for them ;)get a lot more money, Alot more stable etc, etc!Someone explain..?
Did’nt read past here so dont know what was said to you. Firstly the reason for the interpritation of these riots is more control, less tolerence for when we have to stand up, we shall be beat up and called mindless thugs. Except we shall be many, everyone around here was ye’, but not like this this, they know from their policies whats coming and they need to ‘crimilalize’? Us. It doesnt matter what you put into your pension pot, how much NI you pay its gone. If you put forty pound a month away in 1995, you would have less money saved than you put in! You cant expect kids to see this and have ambition. But again i didnt see the responses to this,
0
Voices
44
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags