@djprocess 236621 wrote:
fuck me that was actually a sensible answer.
Assuming that ancient meteorologists oriented Stonehenge / Cursus snow fences of the British Isles and their long side dugouts ideally, Stone Age snow fence orientations are perpendicular to the prevailing cold front / arctic wind directions at each locality. The prevailing wind directions before the construction of Stonehenge / Cursus snow fences, determined by ancient meteorologists observing the orientations of Stone Age snow drifts along natural local obstructions, is predicted.
Studies have shown that a snow fence is no less effective if the wind direction deviates up to 25 degrees from the perpendicular to the snow fence. Given the quantity of Stonehenge / Cursus snow fences in the British Isles, perhaps meteorologists could predict Stone Age weather? Maybe even build some Stone Age Weather Maps? Note: In ~500 year period Stonehenge / Cursus cold front / arctic wind directions changed. The snow fences’ azimuths are not exactly parallel.
BBC – Weather Centre – UK Weather
raaa
@Southcaver 236668 wrote:
Yea man me and gazza are tight raaa
Some benefits of coralling snow:
1) Water for agriculture (farming and ranching).
2) Snowmelt saved trips for river drinking water.
3) Deep snow travel between villages eliminated.
The frequency of cursus snow fences increases northward as expected,
more than fifty (50) Scotland cursus snow fences have been identified:
British Archaeology, no 44, May 1999: Features
British Archaeology magazine, March 2003
Snow fences 6,000 years old!
Journal of Climate
American Meteorological Society
Volume 10, Issue 1 (January 1997)
A GCM Simulation of the Climate 6000 Years Ago
Nicholas M. J. Hall and Paul J. Valdes
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT
Two 10-yr integrations of the UGAMP GCM are presented. Each has a full seasonal cycle, T42 resolution, interactive land and sea ice, and prescribed sea surface temperatures. They differ in that one integration represents present day climate (PD) and the other has a perturbed orbit and reduced atmospheric concentrations of CO2 appropriate to the climate of 6000 years ago (6 kyr, hereafter 6k). The 6k integration produces enhanced continental warmth during summer and cold during winter. Changes in atmospheric temperature gradients brought about by the surface response lead to altered jet stream structures and transient eddy activity, which in turn affect precipitation patterns. Tropical “monsoon”-type circulation patterns are also affected, also leading to altered precipitation. Many of the changes in hydrology mimic the geological record remarkably well: the Sahel is much wetter, as are the midwestern United States and the Mediterranean regions; California and northern Europe are drier. Processes leading to the model’s surface responses in both temperature and hydrology are described in detail. Finally, the sensitivity of the results to an alternative, objective definition of the 6k calendar is investigated. This sensitivity is found to be smaller than the overall signal to the extent that the principal conclusions are not altered.
AMS Online Journals – A GCM Simulation of the Climate 6000 Years Ago
Snow Fences: Ireland, Wales, Scotland, England; 200 Cursus
Cursus
United Kingdom Cursus Snow Fences
“North of these Rocks lies a Great snow fence…”
– Dr. Garry Denke 1656 Diary
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Dig pinpoints Stonehenge origins
just for you garry!! :bounce_fl
@ellie 236893 wrote:
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Dig pinpoints Stonehenge origins
just for you garry!! :bounce_fl
Three hundred and fifty and two (352) years ago German historian, antiquarian and dentist Dr. Garry Denke (1622-1699) claimed that Snow Fence of Rocks (‘Great Cursus of Stonehenge’) and the others were built to trap snow, and Today archaeologists David McOmish (English Heritage), Dr. Kenneth Brophy (University of Glasgow), Dr. Mike Pitts (British Archaeology), Prof. Timothy Darvill (Bournemouth University), Prof. Geoff Wainwright (Society of Antiquaries), Dr. Andrew Fitzpatrick (Wessex Archaeology), Dave Batchelor (English Heritage), Prof. Mike Parker Pearson (University of Sheffield), Prof. Julian Thomas (University of Manchester), Dr. Joshua Pollard (University of Bristol), Dr. Colin Richards (University of Manchester), Chris Tilley (University College London), Dr. Kate Welham (Bournemouth University), and All other United Kingdom archaeologists, claim otherwise.
There are no artifacts in Cursus banks because they are only snow fences.
One of the interesting facts about Cursus Snow Fences and Cursus Reservoir Ditches is that if their ends are left unblocked they will actually dry a field of snowmelt in time for a Spring planting.
It is this dual function which makes Cursus Snow Fences and Cursus Reservoir Ditches so regionally versatile and the reason some have blocked terminals while others have open ends into rivers.
“North of these Rocks lies a Great snow fence… ”
– Dr. Garry Denke 1656 Diary
The Welsh blue chip ‘healing secrets’ of Stonehenge
Sep 23 2008 by Robin Turner, Western Mail
WHY transport more than 80 two- tonne megaliths over 156 miles of mountain, river and sea to build a stone circle at Stonehenge?
It has remained one of Britain’s most enduring mysteries.
Some have claimed the iconic site on Salisbury Plain was an ancient observatory for lunar and solar events.
Others claimed it was a burial site for the high-born while Arthurian legend has it Merlin transported the stones.
But now a Welshman from Pembrokeshire, the place where many believe the stones originate, claims he has the answer.
Professor Geoffrey Wainwright, an honorary fellow of Lampeter and Cardiff Universities, released findings yesterday to support a theory that Stonehenge was a “prehistoric Lourdes”.
The findings suggesting its significance as a healing centre for pilgrims were made in a historic dig at the World Heritage Site earlier this year.
The first excavation of Stonehenge for more than 40 years uncovered fragments of stone which experts believe could have been used as lucky charms.
Professor Wainwright believes that Stonehenge was a centre of healing to which the sick and injured travelled from far and wide, to be healed “by the powers of the bluestones”.
He noted during the dig that “an abnormal number” of the bodies found in tombs near Stonehenge displayed signs of serious physical injury and disease.
And analysis of teeth recovered from graves show that around half of the corpses were from people who were not native to the Stonehenge area.
Archaeology expert Professor Wainwright, chairman of the Society of Antiquaries of London, and Professor Tim Darvill of Bournemouth University, have been working together for years to find out why Stonehenge was built.
English Heritage agreed to the dig on Salisbury Plain, the first since 1964, following consent by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport.
The academics said they could now pinpoint the date at which the blue stones – which the archaeologists believe hold the key to Stonehenge – were brought to the site in Wiltshire from West Wales, as 2300BC, 300 years later than previously thought.
The stones were once believed to have come from a crag in the Preseli Hills called Carn Menyn.
But a newer theory is that they were brought from glacial deposits much nearer the site, which had been carried down from the northern side of the Preselis to southern England by the Irish Sea Glacier.
The professors also told a press conference at the Society of Antiquaries in London that people remained interested in the magical, healing qualities of the stones for many hundreds of years after Stonehenge was built.
Prof Darvill said: “It could have been a temple at the same time as it was a healing centre, just as Lourdes is a religious centre.”
Prof Darvill suggested the blue stones, which have tiny white spots, could have acted in a similar way to the bones of saints.
They argued that as thousands of pilgrims flocked to see them at Stonehenge the resulting wealth enabled an “elaborate shell” of more stone pillars to be built.
Prof Wainwright said he was inspired to investigate the area in his native Pembrokeshire while watching a television programme about why Stonehenge was built.
He said: “I thought the answer really had to be found in the place where the stones came from.
That is in north Pembrokeshire, so Tim and I went and did a survey around the crag.
“We found various reasons which led us to believe the stones were used as part of a belief in a healing process.”
But he said they needed to study the Stonehenge site to find out when the bluestones arrived there and how long they were used. The radiocarbon dating of the original double bluestone circle held significance for the start of Stonehenge being used as a healing centre. The date – 2300BC – links the introduction of the bluestones with a time of great activity at the site, including the death of the Amesbury archer.
His remains were discovered about five miles from Stonehenge and the professors believe he was a pilgrim hoping to benefit from the healing powers of the monument.
Prof Wainwright said: “We now know, much to our surprise and delight, that Stonehenge was not just a prehistoric monument, it was a Roman and medi- aeval monument.”
Were the huge stones transported all the way from West Wales?
The stone pillars of Stonehenge are natural columns of white spotted dolerite and occur only in the Preseli Hills’ Carn Menyn area.
They were first identified as of Welsh origin by Dr John HH Thomas in 1923.
Archaeologists have uncovered the remains of a “band of brothers” found near Stonehenge and scientists have proved they were Welsh, suggesting it was people from Pembrokeshire who actually transported them.
The skeletons, three adults, a teenager and three children, were found by workmen laying a pipe on Boscombe Down and chemical analysis of their teeth revealed they were brought up in the South West Wales area.
Experts believed the family accompanied the stones on their epic journey from the Preseli Hills to Salisbury Plain.
As an extension of the theory that Stonehenge was a healing centre, on digs around the country, archaeologists will now look for any evidence of bluestone being transported from Wales to other monuments.
Professors Wainwright and Darvill also said they hope to return to the Preseli Hills next year to excavate part of a burial mound near the main bluestone outcrops.
Prof Darvill said of the bluestones: “Their meaning and importance to prehistoric people was sufficiently powerful to warrant the investment of time, effort and resources to move the bluestones from the Preseli Hills of Wales to the Wessex downs.”
😉
UK experts say Stonehenge was place of healing
By RAPHAEL G. SATTER – 13 hours ago
LONDON (AP) — The first excavation of Stonehenge in more than 40 years has uncovered evidence that the stone circle drew ailing pilgrims from around Europe for what they believed to be its healing properties, archaeologists said Monday.
Archaeologists Geoffrey Wainwright and Timothy Darvill said the content of graves scattered around the monument and the ancient chipping of its rocks to produce amulets indicated that Stonehenge was the primeval equivalent of Lourdes, the French shrine venerated for its supposed ability to cure the sick.
An unusual number of skeletons recovered from the area showed signs of serious disease or injury. Analysis of their teeth showed that about half were from outside the Stonehenge area.
“People were in a state of distress, if I can put it as politely as that, when they came to the Stonehenge monument,” Darvill told journalists assembled at London’s Society of Antiquaries.
He pointed out that experts near Stonehenge have found two skulls that showed evidence of primitive surgery, some of just a few known cases of operations in prehistoric Britain.
“Even today, that’s the pretty serious end of medicine,” he said. Also found near Stonehenge was the body of a man known as the Amesbury Archer, who had a damaged skull and badly hurt knee and died around the time the stones were being installed. Analysis of the Archer’s bones showed he was from the Alps.
Darvill cautioned, however, that the new evidence did not rule out other uses for Stonehenge.
“It could have been a temple, even as it was a healing center,” Darvill said. “Just as Lourdes, for example, is still a religious center.”
The archaeologists managed to date the construction of the stone monument to about 2,300 B.C., a couple of centuries younger than was previously thought. It was at that time that bluestones — a rare rock known to geologists as spotted dolomite — were shipped by hand or by raft from Pembrokeshire in Wales to Salisbury Plain in southern England, to create the inner circle of Stonehenge.
The outer circle, composed of much larger sandstone slabs, is what most people associate with the monument today, particularly since only about a third of the 80 or so bluestones remain. The scientists argued that they were once at the heart of Stonehenge, and closely associated with its healing properties.
As evidence, Darvill said his dig had uncovered masses of fragments carved out of the bluestones by people to create amulets. Any rock carried around in such a way would have had some sort of protective or healing property, he said. He said that theory was backed by burials in southwest England where the stones were interred with their owners.
Today the bluestones are now largely invisible, dwarfed by the huge sandstone monoliths — or “hanging stones” — that were erected later and still make up Stonehenge’s iconic profile.
“They are of course quite impressive when you see them,” Darvill said. “But in a sense they are the elaboration of a structure which kicked off with the bluestones.”
Both archaeologists quoted the 12th-century monk Geoffrey of Monmouth as saying the stones were thought to have medicinal properties. They also said that evidence uncovered by their dig showed that people were moving and chipping off pieces of the bluestones through the Roman period and even into the Middle Ages.
Darvill said he felt the “folklore interest” in the bluestones into modern times suggested some sort of lingering memory of their supposed healing powers.
“That would be for me the single strongest piece of evidence,” he said.
Andrew Fitzpatrick, from British heritage group Wessex Archaeology, said Darvill and Wainwright’s discovery was “very important” but that the healing theory, while plausible, was not the only one.
“I don’t think we can rule out the other main competing theory — that the temple was a meeting point between the land of the living and the dead,” he told the British Broadcasting Corp.
The scientists announced their findings Monday, ahead of a documentary due to air on the BBC and the Smithsonian Channel on Saturday, Sept. 27.
😉
Dig pinpoints Stonehenge origins
“Let the Healing begin, Again.”
0
Voices
36
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags