@MC G-Tek 529157 wrote:
No mate, there are no real ones at all. They’re all cunts, offering false hope to the bereaved and charging them for it. I genuinely believe it should be illegal to do that shit and should come with a long prison sentence.
Actually is is illegal to advertise psychic services without the disclaimer “For entertainment purposes only”. And I must admit there are some very convincing frauds who do fleece guillable people.
TheLog wrote:
Oh and I don’t believe in any type of meduims or psychics, remote viewers etc. But I do believe in contacting familiar spirits via drugs. 😛
Unfair to include RV in the list. See, RVers don’t have any idea what they’re supposed to be contacting or gaining information on – they operate completely blind. The formal definition is, “Psychic Functioning within a Double blind protocol.” So they don’t know what or who or when they are describing, nor does anybody else at the time they do a session record.
Not surprisingly, RV isn’t 100%, but there is a small to medium (no pun intended) statistical effect. Scientifically speaking, it is “real” and not random. You want the papers you can read them here.
Welcome! Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, Anomalous Cognition Remote Viewing Scientific Research
NOW, to answer the original question – I did set up a task asking someone to describe somebody who was dead, and their culture. All they had to go on was a random tag. They did describe the person. How accurate where they? Maybe 60%. Not great but pretty awesome considering all they had to go on was a 12 digit hex number. Could have been anything, anywhen. But it’s not like they had a conversation with them.
Perhaps some people can have dialogue with dead people, but it isn’t something I have observed. So I don’t know. I’m open minded enough to think it could be possible. But I doubt many people really want to know or develop such abilities, as it makes them very sinister and strange to “normal” people who haven’t been exposed to such oddities.
