@shift 388264 wrote:
just thought id throw it out there to see if it raised any eyebrows. it did. commonly used word ,doesn’t mean anything to me.
yes i do know what it means.
Father? i dunno man that’s religion think?
member of NWA? KKK? Yes, yes i am.
Wow edgy post.
What will you think of next to dazzel us with your rapier like wit?
@shift 388258 wrote:
should apply to you cunts.
No need to be so bitter. We’re not German you know.
Wasn’t that a cracking game. what was the score again?
Oh yeah, 4 – 0. LOL!!! :laugh_at:
@GiantMidget 388314 wrote:
No need to be so bitter. We’re not German you know.
Wasn’t that a cracking game. what was the score again?
Oh yeah, 4 – 0. LOL!!! :laugh_at:
“wounded”
@General Lighting 388305 wrote:
this is only a suggestion by some adviser (from the previous govt), same as the ones from the ACMD that we shouldn’t have knee jerk reactions to drugs prohibition, and we know what happened to those. The new govt is worried about the effects on the drinks industry anyway.
I’m much more concerned about the increasing backlash against alcohol use by everyone, not just drivers..
Listening to some conservative bloke on Radio 4 makes me feel better, they dont seem keen at all and apparently said before the election they didn’t want to do it. Happy days.
@AGENT 15 388306 wrote:
Wow edgy post.
What will you think of next to dazzel us with your rapier like wit?
This is normal posting for this guy, i remember last time he came on he just insulted me in many posts. I was called a ‘Noob’….. what an insult.
I dont see the problem with this. Idiots who drive whilst under the influence deserve all they get. A
@Voodoomonkey 388686 wrote:
I dont see the problem with this. Idiots who drive whilst under the influence deserve all they get. A
its about changing the legal limit not prosecuting more people under the current one but thanks for your time.
0
Voices
20
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags