Forums › Drugs › Cannabis & Hashish › Earn $50 grassing up a pot smoker.
Saw this posted on BoingBoing.net :
“Every year on 4/20, students and residents gather on Farrand Field at CU Boulder to defy the authorities and smoke marijuana publicly. This year, the University of Boulder Police Department fought back by taking pictures of as many participants as possible. They have a website with photos up, offering an $50 reward to anyone who positively identifies someone who was photographed. Nothing about what the authorities plan to do with the information is posted. Scary.”
http://www.colorado.edu/police/420_Photo_Album/index.htm
This is pretty scary, you can see from the link that a fair few have already been identified.
The authorities are paying students to grass each other up. Doesnt that seem particularily wrong to you ?
That’s some proper underhand fucked up business there.
its fucking dangerous IMO as well
ISTR that our former US moderator Lady Luck got busted for an empty bag and had all sorts of harsh stuff happen to her – her college grant was revoked, her driving license taken away (this is a common penalty for drug use in the USA – for piddling amounts that in this country may get you a caution but only if cops can be arsed to fill in the paperwork..
if people get busted because of this it could fuck up someones future to the point where they feel they have “nothing more left to lose” by taking revenge against whoever they thought grassed them up
this is in a country where young people have easy access to guns…
hey gl:
you take a lot of photos at parties don’t you?
😮
para-side!
out of interest, why?
there are a lot of threads here about my interest in photography; one shared by many others on this board.
the pics I take at parties (where I know a lot of the crew) are mostly pics of the stack, long distance views (which make it hard to identify individuals), often shot without using flash to get the lighting effects and are people I know and random stuff from the venues. Anything else potentially dodgy is deleted.
Also a few wildlife pics of any animals I see (sometimes at house parties people show you their pets) – have a look at the animal photos on the gallery.
many of my photos used to go on our gallery and even on the SJ galleries but obviously I can’t put them up now because of the PEL regulations. those I did upload went through a lot of processing to clean them up and remove metadata – I do not upload entire unedited camera chips to the public internet like some people seemed to do (complete with camera date and time stamps etc..)
since digital photos don’t cost anything I also tend to shoot 100+ pics and only use about 30 or so of the best ones. they do get circulated amongst people in the crews who put on the events (the ketwork32 lot) and are stored on peoples personal collections.
Some of my pictures (suitably edited) have been used for flyers and other material the crews produce.
Loads of people have quite extensive collections of their own and others rave photos which are passed around by private e-mail or CD-R, the same “samizdat” method used by most underground scenes..
I started doing this around 1997/8 or so (used to use normal film cameras before digital ones became common. Loads of people have collections of pics at raves; there were some particularly ropey ones of me on the SJ gallery..
i love taking photos
it’s impossible to catch that human connection on photo, but the ‘action’ photos of lighting and dance are a good way to experiment with a camera
and sunrises make a good subject
i dont mind a spot of photography. would love to get a digital slr . been using a crappy digital cam in wales over the weekend with a huge 3.0 megapixels!! i now regret using this cam as all the photos werent quitwe right, especially ones of the truly spectacular scenery that i will probably never see again.
Do want to stick any of them online?
the amount of pixels only makes a difference when you are printing to large sheets of paper. I currently only use a 3.2 megapixel camera and even this should produce a decent quality print on whole A4 size .
if you use a small dye-sub or “photo” printer even 3.2MP produces good quality. As an experiment I put some of these photos in an album with older normal photos originated from traditional film.
I passed this round amongst a load of friends and the only one who could tell the digital and film photos apart was a chap who once installed CCTV video cameras for a living and would have noticed the subtle differences in colour.
what does matter is manual control over the aperture and shutter settings of the camera. you may find your camera has these controls, if so experiment with them and learn how to use them.
A lot of smaller compacts do only perform well in bright light and Wales is often cloudy and overcast (bear in mind that you may have been in a state of mind where colours seem brighter than they actually are….)
photoshop can also clear up a lot of “duff” photos. “Adjust Levels” is your friend 😉
@General Lighting]photoshop can also clear up a lot of “duff” photos. “Adjust Levels” is your friend )[/QUOTE wrote:
Totally. I resurrected many apparently black photos and even a few videos (not with photoshop obviously 😉 ). Its amazing what turns up. Some quality footage was nearly lost…
“Every year on 4/20, students and residents gather on Farrand Field at CU Boulder to defy the authorities and smoke marijuana publicly. This year, the University of Boulder Police Department fought back by taking pictures of as many participants as possible. They have a website with photos up, offering an $50 reward to anyone who positively identifies someone who was photographed. Nothing about what the authorities plan to do with the information is posted. Scary.”
http://www.colorado.edu/police/420_Photo_Album/index.htm
This is pretty scary, you can see from the link that a fair few have already been identified.
Thats fucking stupid. You can’t get done for smoking it in the past they’ve gotta catch you in possession anyway init?
prince harry???
in regards to charges, there really isnt anything they can do – whats to say that the joints didnt contain just tobacco???
photographic evidence like this wouldnt be allowed to be used in this country to convict someone – you would also need physical evidence such as the joint in the actuall picture.
thats why kate moss got away because they couldnt prove that the photos showed her snorting cocaine – just a white powder
0
Voices
11
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Drugs › Cannabis & Hashish › Earn $50 grassing up a pot smoker.