Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

English or British?

Forums Life English or British?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 78 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • andy ridgeway wrote:
    it would be a lot better

    it was mainstream in 1988

    The music may have been popular, but in your opinion what were the people like? I was the youngest of 3 brothers and had loads of older cousins which is how i got into it. I would have thought that as crowds get bigger they tend to attract scrots to?

    andy ridgeway wrote:
    oh right.

    a joke.

    i’m sorry if i don’t find taking pride in my heritage a laughing matter.

    hmm there is also a lot in your heritage that isnt a laughing matter or to be proud of IMO, and I can say that where ever you come from, so go on enlighten me what are you so proud of.

    on application forms when it comes to filling in my ethnic background, i tick the other box and state ‘Aryian’ 😉 😀

    but seriosuly i consider myself english, i dont see anything wrong with having some sort of identity within the british isles….

    elraveon wrote:
    hmm there is also a lot in your heritage that isnt a laughing matter or to be proud of IMO, and I can say that where ever you come from, so go on enlighten me what are you so proud of.

    a democratic parliamentary system, the modern judicial system, railways, the aspiration towards social equality, shakespeare, stonehenge, cricket and football, the landscape of this green and pleasant land, the language itself, the art, WWII,the NHS, the eagerness to learn from other cultures, the BBC, the sheer awe inspiring influence that a tiny island race could hold over such a swathe of the planet, in the face of such overwhelming odds, just the sheer indomitable spirit of the English over the centuries. i could think of an A4 page full of them if you’d like but you get the picture.

    do you think that the legacy we left in a place like India, for instance, is generally positive or negative?

    ask an Indian, you may well be surprised by their response.

    so to turn the question round to you sir, what do you think that I should be ashamed of, as an Englishman?

    i mean, that I wouldn’t be ashamed of if i were a citizen of any other nationality.

    ie: aggression towards one’s neighbours for instance is a fairly generic quality of nationhood, if you got on all fine and dandy you wouldn’t be seperate countries in the first place would you?

    Cornish

    andy ridgeway wrote:
    a democratic parliamentary system, the modern judicial system, railways, the aspiration towards social equality, shakespeare, stonehenge, cricket and football, the landscape of this green and pleasant land, the language itself, the art, WWII,the NHS, the eagerness to learn from other cultures, the BBC, the sheer awe inspiring influence that a tiny island race could hold over such a swathe of the planet, in the face of such overwhelming odds, just the sheer indomitable spirit of the English over the centuries.

    I always wondered who the narrator on Little Britain was 🙂

    do you think that the legacy we left in a place like India, for instance, is generally positive or negative?

    ask an Indian, you may well be surprised by their response.

    thats because they’re getting their payback though by wrestling away work from the UK as they can often do it slightly better and for a fraction of the cost because they were all forced to learn English and adopt British culture.

    whilst at the same time the new “natives” of Britain dumb themselves down and piss all the gains of their previous generations up the wall (and half of them don’t even realise they are doing so)

    thats said I do think that the lack of or denial of a true identity to England is a big problem.

    there are some shitty things though like the pettiness regarding noise/music (one major reason why raves are so clamped down on) and the whole “middle england” attitude TBH

    you need to be proud of the spirit of British people (including those in the Celtic areas of the UK) rather than the British Establishment, which has divided and conquered the world as well as produced a few good things.

    and I think the full history of the Empire should be taught in schools; OTOH they will need to have bobbies on standby as in todays multicultural school when young lads learn of past conflicts and oppressions they may well decide to try and right past wrongs in the playgrounds and on the streets,..

    General Lighting wrote:
    thats because they’re getting their payback though by wrestling away work from the UK as they can often do it slightly better and for a fraction of the cost because they were all forced to learn English and adopt British culture.

    True as that statement is, I was talking in a much broader sense than their advantageous position in the burgeoning new global service economy. Also, I don’t think that they will be the world’s call centre for that long either, as their society advances at a furious rate they will pass that kind of employment down the line as the UK has done and the cycle of capitalist development will restart in a yet less developed country. India is one of the next great global superpowers, along with China (obviously), and potentially Brazil, imo…

    What I meant was, was India a better or a worse country after the departure of the British, than before they arrived?

    I believe that anyone with an objective view of history (rather than the selfloathing and contextually selective views more fashionable at present) will be forced to admit that the longterm quantifiable advances in Indian society ultimately outweighed the shortterm parasitic presence of the British.

    The British effectively took control of the entire subcontinent with only a handful of shots fired. Why do you think that their presence was greeting with such a lack of hostility? Also, the British set up a capitalist system which benefitted London, hence their eventual forced departure. But what this meant was once the Indians gained sovreignty, all of the infrastructure was immediately in place for the Indians themselves to benefit hugely from the vision, technology, and social ideas of their “guests” 😉

    Jamaican innit!

    Bareside.

    Irish :bigsmile: the last celts basically
    andy ridgeway wrote:
    What I meant was, was India a better or a worse country after the departure of the British, than before they arrived?

    The British left their colonies the least fucked up out of all the imperialist nations (look at USA trying to do the same thing in Iraq – or even in London!).

    Thats as good as history can ever be made to be painted, and people in England have to also accept that because of this there will be immigration to the UK from the former colonies and there is nothing they can do about it (apart from obvious border controls and criminal checks which the govt seems unable to adminster properly) unless they want even more actual race conflict on the streets.

    Quote:
    But what this meant was once the Indians gained sovreignty, all of the infrastructure was immediately in place for the Indians themselves to benefit hugely from the vision, technology, and social ideas of their “guests” 😉

    I find it ironic though that many Asians have more appreciation for British feats of engineering than people do in the UK!

    OTOH it was a two way thing – I was looking at an article on traditional English food and was surprised to find out how early the influences of Indian cuisine came over here.

    Also games similar to cricket were played in Asia since ancient time..

    on this note, as for Norman Tebbits “cricket test” although I am not a great fan of cricket I do support England (a team which now has significant numbers of British Asians) – but often find their performance is too painful a spectacle to watch….

    english all the way

    andy ridgeway wrote:
    a democratic parliamentary system, the modern judicial system, railways, the aspiration towards social equality, shakespeare, stonehenge, cricket and football, the landscape of this green and pleasant land, the language itself, the art, WWII,the NHS, the eagerness to learn from other cultures, the BBC, the sheer awe inspiring influence that a tiny island race could hold over such a swathe of the planet, in the face of such overwhelming odds, just the sheer indomitable spirit of the English over the centuries. i could think of an A4 page full of them if you’d like but you get the picture.

    do you think that the legacy we left in a place like India, for instance, is generally positive or negative?

    ask an Indian, you may well be surprised by their response.

    so to turn the question round to you sir, what do you think that I should be ashamed of, as an Englishman?

    i mean, that I wouldn’t be ashamed of if i were a citizen of any other nationality.

    ie: aggression towards one’s neighbours for instance is a fairly generic quality of nationhood, if you got on all fine and dandy you wouldn’t be seperate countries in the first place would you?

    I think you jest with me ol chap and I know from past experiences chatting to you that you like to play devils advocate, even though I question the motive of those that only announce this after the debate rather than declare it from the start I’ll bite
    but I dont know if I can do justice to the question you have put me because its not as simple as you make out. The need for countries and defense of your borders, is more to do with the aggression of those that would lord it over others and not down to members of the general public of any nation. You put forward imperialism as a good thing “ask a Indian” you and I know that would depend on who you asked and your mistaken if you think our rule in India was bloodless or that we were wanted there by all. I think you should ask a native American or a aborigine. Maybe you should ask a arab or a slave I don’t think slavery was much to be proud of, I don’t think our feudal system is anything to be proud of or our acceptance of the remains that we all live under still.

    Our parliament is a joke and if the British weren’t so subdued we would see its true colours and its only something to look up to if you are in denial or full of the English disease of doublethink.

    I am ashamed of the acceptance or denial of a two tier class system and the level of control the unelected upper section have without contest.

    WWII is not as clear cut as it seems and what it was about is linked with national disputes and power struggles above and beyond Hitler.

    are you proud of war, or that we started bombing civilians, or that we wouldn’t let londerners down the undergrounds until they had to take them by force or that we bombed whole cities so they were completely destroyed by fire storms.

    The sheer indomitable spirit of the English over the centuries is despite our leaders and to get our so called rights and freedoms were hard won and often not popular by the collaborating classes and are being withdrawn daily

    you raise many valid and interesting conversational avenues there elraveon

    but you’re heading off on a tangent from the crux of your original premise:

    England: Good? Or Evil?!

    😀 😉

    so who do i know you as?

    not the famed and ancient son of Basildon by any chance?

    😮

    andy ridgeway wrote:
    you raise many valid and interesting conversational avenues there elraveon

    but you’re heading off on a tangent from the crux of your original premise:

    England: Good? Or Evil?!

    😀 😉

    so who do i know you as?

    not the famed and ancient son of Basildon by any chance?

    😮

    erm you question was

    so to turn the question round to you sir, what do you think that I should be ashamed of, as an Englishman?

    i mean, that I wouldn’t be ashamed of if i were a citizen of any other nationality.

    ie: aggression towards one’s neighbours for instance is a fairly generic quality of nationhood, if you got on all fine and dandy you wouldn’t be seperate countries in the first place would you?

    I think I answered the above questions. in brief as englishmen we should be ashamed of our class system and the mayhem it has thrust on the world over the centuries and right up to today.

    as to good or evil that sounds like a religious choice, we are certainly not good and our unelected leaders are as near to evil as you could get if there are two forces such as good and evil 😉

    born in england, scottish, english and irish granparents (one born in Cuba)

    i have a british passport

    married to an immigrant

    i’ve lived one third of my life abroad

    if I could choose I’d be Chilean

    Andy, england good or evil? a country can’t be either. the fact that our last foreign secretry considered not selling arms to somalia at the moment suggests that our elected govt must have some good in them

    while living abroad i’ve come accross to very different general assumptions about english people.1) insular, stupid, arrogant, drunk, violent 2) well educated, well travelled, good telly programs, good parties. I think the second one was made up so as not to cause offense to me personally

0

Voices

76

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 78 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Life English or British?