Forums › Life › Politics, Media & Current Events › ethical drug dealing
But where do you draw the line? Say you grow a little for you and your mates, that’s a good thing it keeps you clear of dodgy dealer types. But then you start growing a bit more and then you dont need to work anymore because your making enough money from the sale of the bud. Is this wrong? You wont be paying tax on the money you earn and you will probably have to sign on to hide the way your funding yourself…..
I dont have the answers. I am just aware that there is a fine line.
I tottaly agree mate, i beleive the goverment should legalise cannabis and then tax it. This way they can then put the money they make from it, which incidently would be massive, into hard drug rehibilitation programs to keep people off smack. That way they can hardly argue cannabis is a gateway drug. This would be a highly contriversioal plan and obviously no party in their right mind would even consider it but i think it would work :rolleyes:
or am i just a crazy bastard with crazy ideas? :lol_crash
i saw a pretty convincing article a couple of years ago that looked at the average purity of street heroin and the quantities used by addicts
a quick bit of maths worked out that £100 of street H could be produced by the NHS for under £2
i’m not suggesting that we get everyone hooked on smack
just that if your bike cost you, say, £250 and it get’s nicked by a wag head, and sold in a hurry for £25, then that’s 10 bikes, with a value of £2500, plus the cost of police time, plus the increase in insurance premiums for a buzz worth less than £20
plus, decriminalisation eliminates the power of gun toting heroin smugglers, whch can only be a good thing (unless you’re a gun toting heroin smuggler)
i think the criminalisation of weed has led to the skunk phenomenon, which can be said to be linked to increased mental health problems… if weed was legal worldwide, we’d all still most likely be smoking a bit of african bush as producers wouldn’t be desperately trying to find the most concentrated and commercially viable form… after all, if I may use alcohol as a comparison (as a socially acceptable drug) beer is legal, and we aren’t constantly searching out new and ever more potent forms of beer… we know the difference between Carlsberg and Stolichnaya… it clearly tells us what each contain on the container
we the freed, free the weed, indeed
that reminds me of a free the weed march i went on in about ’97 in London where we’d listened to many good speakers (editor of The Independant newspaper, Jack Straw’s son, Howard Marks was a crap speaker tho:neutral: ) and late in the afternoon, beneath the Trafalgar Square lions, who were smoking 8 foot spliffs :crazy_fre , some old cockney started laying into smokers, twatting them with his rolled up :surprised copy of The Sun and shouting “you drunken layabouts”
I think he missed the point, slightly
Personally I don’t think they should legalise cannabis. Sure the government could begin producing it but no doubt the government, like all things in this country, will over charge for the cannabis products thus directing the user back to seeking out dealers. Take cigarettes for exampe, what smokers doesn’t stock up on hundreds when abroad or at the duty free? Plus we also have black market cigarette dealers, yet tobacco products we all know are legal.
Legalising one drug to fund the rehabilitation of another? As for the gateway I think it’s fair to assume that the high majority of smack users participated in the use of cannabis before experiencing smack.
Actually we do in the form of stonger beers and high volume spirits. Because alcohol is legal, in liquid form and has the same resulting effect we do not appriciate that, like drugs, some forms of alcohol is more lethal than others.
It’s unfortunate to hear about your friends. On the other hand as fitness a professional this quote sounds alot like how the government runs the country – create a problem and create a solution. Your friends can smoke all the weed in Africa, but it will not make them any better or improve their health but merely act as a pain killer. Their problem still exsists.
There has been quite some press in the last few years providing cannabis as a pain killer. What ever happened to making people well again? There has been alot of attention on this subject because in the last decade the entire country has gone to pot (excuse the pun) when it comes to their health. Over 50% of the population are over weight and because of the vast numbers of people becoming ill the hospitals are unable to cope. If we were doing more of an effort to prevent people from becoming ill in the first place there would be no need for the use of cannabis.
Prevention rather than cure.
0
Voices
4
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Life › Politics, Media & Current Events › ethical drug dealing