Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Farm Raves

Forums Rave Clubbing & Raving Farm Raves

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Farm Raves

    Imagine the scene. It’s two in the morning and blaring music keeps you awake. You look out of your window and see a mass of ravers partying on your land. You summon the police and they arrive 20 minutes later. What would you expect them to do? It’s your land, the party-goers are there without your permission and you can already imagine how much clearing up awaits you when they depart. You might well expect the police to send the ravers on their way.

    Wrong. Not if the case of David Benton is anything to go by. A farmer in Lincolnshire, we brought you his story last week. On New Year’s Eve, his farm was invaded by dozens of ravers who broke down a gate so they could drive lorries onto his property.

    They took over one of his buildings and installed a sound system for a 12-hour rave without his permission.

    But when Mr Benton called police to intervene they told him that they couldn’t do anything. They said there were less than 100 people at the party and so legally no offence was being committed.

    “I said people have caused criminal damage to my property. I said I would like them removed from my property”, Mr Benton told the programme. “The police just stood around and the girls had their arms around them.”

    Many of our listeners were shocked. The decision seemed to fly in the face of common sense.

    But Mr Benton’s experience turned out to be nothing compared to what happened to
    Graeme Stephen. He emailed us because he’d found himself in a similar position – calling the police to move ravers off his land.

    Mr Stephen had had this problem before – and didn’t think the police would take any action. In this case, however, they did. They arrested Mr Stephen.

    “The question is what are the police there to do? Are they there to protect people in terms of property, or is property irrelevant – in which case mob rule applies”, Mr Stephen told us.

    The Today Programme received hundreds of emails on the subject, and our listeners were divided. Some were astonished at what the police had done – and even had their own examples.

    Philip Goodall from Buckinghamshire had found police reluctant to evict hundreds of people at a party in his warehouse because there were “too many people”.

    But others defended the police. Sue Matthews of Lancashire, who insists she is “not a police officer – or anything to do with them”, said the police did act correctly because “protection of property cannot take priority over public safety”. Dave Bancroft of Milton Keynes agreed.

    “Any heavy-handed approach would have caused trouble and not ‘kept the peace’,” he argued.

    Do you believe the police acted correctly? Click here to have your say.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/archive/features/farm_raves.shtml

    go and read the reply emails too

    and please post your comments below …

    bloody raves they get everywhere.

    :laugh_at::laugh_at::laugh_at::laugh_at: :groucho: :groucho: :groucho:

    Raj wrote:
    Mr Stephen had had this problem before – and didn’t think the police would take any action. In this case, however, they did. They arrested Mr Stephen.

    I don’t Mr Stephen’s case but there is no mention of why he was arrested. If he went and smacked a few heads, trashed cars and discharged shoutguns then I’m not suprised.

    BioTech wrote:
    I don’t Mr Stephen’s case but there is no mention of why he was arrested. If he went and smacked a few heads, trashed cars and discharged shoutguns then I’m not suprised.

    There are claims further in the report that he was threatening violence. In this case the cops would nick him for his own safety – he is after all heavily outnumbered and although 98% of ravers are peaceful there is always the chance someone would try to play the hard man.

    Things can get a bit twisted on Sunday comedowns – and cops know more these days about the psychology of rave crowds (or any large crowd) and what they are capable of.

    BTW this report is about 2 years old – there were also a number of fairly pragmatic comments where non-ravers were asking why it was not possible for farmers to rent out their land to hold these events legally.

    The truth is that it is; all farms can have up to 21 days of non-agricultural activity on them in a year without jepoardising their Single Farm Payment (the new subsidy) but groups like the NFU often exaggerate the level of risk that rave events pose to the farmers business.

    TBH the risk from a well-run event (such as the Planet Yes event which was AFAIK licensed) is no worse than any other business risk involved with farming and could make use of land that is unusable for agriculture or livestock.

    OK I can see that some farmers may be angry as they feel they are being “bullied” into accepting these events on their land but if they rent out an area for a TENS event the liability rests with the organisers (who are accountable for any problems that may occur) – seems like a fair system to me.

    for years farmers were propped up by an EU subsidy safety net which was keeping a lot of unprofitable farms going – now this is has been heavily downsized there is probably going to be more “low value” land turning up anyway; particularly in areas remote from villages…

    its not like farmers didnt used to rent out their land for raves its just after they had the whole village hated them an then the CJA just made it alot harder to di it legaly

    Meltown wrote:
    its not like farmers didnt used to rent out their land for raves its just after they had the whole village hated them an then the CJA just made it alot harder to di it legaly

    Of course not all farms would be suitable though due to location (particularly here where most of the ground is flat!)

    Clearly if the noise is disturbing others it would be even worse as the farmer is making money from this as well – it would be no different from if he decided to run agricultural machinery or do heavy building work all through the night.

    the organisers also need to work carefully to keep noise out of non-target areas (noname has posted loads of good info about this) and be prepared to relocate stacks or reduce sound levels. People collect huge stacks when they can get the same sound quality out of far smaller ones…

    Also people need to park sensibly. If need be crews have to put on hi vis and direct the traffic into a parking space (makes it easier for people to get out again).

    A bit of organisation and consideration for the wider community can easily stop many problems before they happen.

    back to the days of the circus tents with 10,000 people dancing and pills that only have mdma in them………damn i missed out

    Meltown wrote:
    back to the days of the circus tents with 10,000 people dancing and pills that only have mdma in them………damn i missed out

    nah, TBH you didnt; I have been partying from 1991 but IMO from the late 90s until the PEL backlash in 2004 was the best time for UK rave.

    There was a honeymoon period with UK raves but it lasted from about 1991-1992 – a mere year before things started going darkside.

    those big circus tent parties of the early 1990s were often blighted by organised gangs of rudeboys going straight through the middle of the crowd and mugging people with knives etc… even today at large organised raves robbery is a big problem.

    This country is angry and violent and you cannot keep a lid on a crowd that size without security who can watch people closely as well as put in the muscle; but security of that calibre are intimidating (they have to be!).

    Even when crowds reach 4000-5000 at outdoor raves you get the gangs of local wannabe hardmen / car-stealing chavs / pikeys etc all on the outskirts

    People look at early 90s parties with rose coloured specs and the videos you may see have been edited to make them look better (the organisation wasn’t as good as its made out to be) – they were fucking expensive too and a lot of the money went straight into the hands of the cops for PEL license fees.

    for every good pill there were just as many snide ones and it was an expensive lottery at £10-15 a time

    Because of this there was also a lot more crime done by earlier ravers to pay for the lifestyles and a lot more hardcore gangsters in the scene as there was a lot more money to be made serving up.

    even then I used to primarily go to free parties had one stack of a few speakers as rigs were way more expensive back then – by the mid 1990s the Chinese had mass produced everything and reduced the start up costs for stuff like amps (even if they are made here the components are usually Chinese these days)

    If party crews can get round the backlash and work with local communities there are still plenty of decent events to come..

    I don’t know Mr Stephen’s case but there is no mention of why he was arrested. If he went and smacked a few heads, trashed cars and discharged shoutguns then I’m not suprised.

0

Voices

8

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Rave Clubbing & Raving Farm Raves