well if i’ve read into his message wrong and he is looking for work, then fair enough and i’m happy for him to get JSA (as i’ve already said)… but i don’t think i have read it wrong 😉
@ellie 334572 wrote:
well if i’ve read into his message wrong and he is looking for work, then fair enough and i’m happy for him to get JSA (as i’ve already said)… but i don’t think i have read it wrong 😉
The question about whether or not you have read this wrong can only ultimately be answered by the person who wrote the post:group_hug
so have we been arguing about different things? once it is definate that someone is taking JSA with no intention of getting a job…do you then think they are in the wrong?
@ellie 334575 wrote:
so have we been arguing about different things? once it is definate that someone is taking JSA with no intention of getting a job…do you then think they are in the wrong?
This is a complex question with not really a clear cut answer.
As I said above, what about failing companies who extract millions of public money and pay it out as fat cat bonuses.
As I said above, what about failing companies who extract millions of public money and pay it out as fat cat bonuses.
why can’t they both be wrong?…different degrees of wrong fair enough, but still both wrong.
@ellie 334578 wrote:
why can’t they both be wrong?…different degrees of wrong fair enough, but still both wrong.
I will have to think about this and post later.
your reply better be good then! 😉
@ellie 334578 wrote:
why can’t they both be wrong?…different degrees of wrong fair enough, but still both wrong.
Which do you think is worse?
I guess each case would be different. Some JSA claims would be more morally wrong, some unearnt bonuses would be worse. But for this argument i don’t think it really matters. my point is that it is wrong to claim JSA without seeking a job.
woooo strange thought man!
@ellie 334593 wrote:
I guess each case would be different. Some JSA claims would be more morally wrong, some unearnt bonuses would be worse. But for this argument i don’t think it really matters. my point is that it is wrong to claim JSA without seeking a job.
I have had a hard day and you are exhausting..
thank you :ty_ty:
@ellie 334602 wrote:
thank you :ty_ty:
:laugh_at: what an emoticon
@ellie 334585 wrote:
your reply better be good then! 😉
As I have said previously, there is no clear cut answer as to what is right or wrong (actually I like the ambiguity of 360 shades of grey). Really it just depends on you personal politics and you will find all sorts on this site. At the end of the day, this is warehouse party site not a god damn facist convention. There are some people who are free spirits or creative and just like to do their own thing (Ian Brown from the stone roses was a doley). Would you also condemn a generation of hippies who opted to get off the grid and sit round the camp fire at festivals with a big fat spliff instead of going to work. I don’t care if someone’s on the dole or not, it is certainly not a criteria for pidgeonholing someone as worthless. I have met all sorts and I am not the sort to point a long moralistic judgemental finger.
To sum up, based on the totality of your postings, I would say that you are a woman who likes (and in fact needs) to be tied up and spanked. This is not just a passing thought, I have a sixth sense and am normally spot on this kind of thing.
0
Voices
161
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags