JUSTICE

Welcome To

This topic is empty.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)

1 2 →

Author

Posts
June 24, 2007 at 11:36 am

#692528
1

CaNaMmBeAR ELecrit

@canammbear-elecrit

Member
On a day that see the trail of death issued to chemical Ali, a brother

of Sadam Husane and the reported mastermind of the chemical atacks on

the kurds that killed over 1800 people,

I have to ask my self, why globaly socioly reconised Justice has not been

taken against such Western firms that suplied those chemical

weapons to Sadams Regime?
June 24, 2007 at 11:54 am

#888295
1

jonahug

@jonahug

Member
Two wrongs, dont make a Wright.
June 24, 2007 at 11:57 am

#888281
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
found an interesting article on it at:

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein:
The U.S. Tilts toward Iraq, 1980-1984[/FONT][/FONT]
National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 82
Edited by Joyce Battle
February 25, 2003
June 24, 2007 at 12:07 pm

#888282
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Who armed Saddam?
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/51/040.html

From Lev Lafayette, 26 July 2002

1. The British Foreign Office’s Report on Strategic Export Controls (released last night) shows that:

a. Arms sales to Indonesia increased from #2m to #15.5m. Licences include all-wheel vehicles, components for aircraft cannon, combat aircraft and military aero-engines. This to a country that committed state-sponsored terror in East Timor.

b. Arms sales to Pakistan increased from #6m to #14m. This to a military dictatorship that created the Taliban.

2. In light of these figures, and the rhetoric of war against Iraq, some points need to be made. Given that Saddam is often described as a man who is willing to kill his own people by using chemical weapons, it’s worth examining who armed him in the first place…
June 24, 2007 at 12:52 pm

#888283
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
On a day that see the trail of death issued to the nicknamed chemical Ali, a brother

of Sadam Husane and the reported mastermind of the chemical atacks on

the kurds that killed somwhat in the regine of 180,000 people.

I have to ask my self, why? Globaly socioly reconised Justice has not been

taken against such Western firms that suplied those chemical

weapons to Sadams Regime?
June 24, 2007 at 2:21 pm

#888284
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
I do not see Religioun as being a barier or a reason for breaking fundermental

human rights.

We as a Human Race, have overcome the diferencies of lifstyle, culture and

beliefs before historicaly and so we must and can again
June 24, 2007 at 3:43 pm

#888285
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Hello,

Please don’t copy paste whole articles into the forum, links and extracts are sufficient to make your point…

Thanks and welcome to the site since we’ve not spoken before!

Dr B.

Ok, sorry,

I quoted the site,

I shall try not to do so again,

I just felt that those issues were

Relervent and not being discused openly in genral

media, there for I felt a responsibility to enable

people to be made aware of some TRUE FACTS.
June 24, 2007 at 3:44 pm

#888286
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
No problem, thanks for understanding…

Dr B.

I dont understand though, why you have edited it, since is it not just as bad to go pasting “youtube” clips into partyvibe forumsd?

Those facts where everdently TRUE, and recorded from actual freedom of infomation Documents,

WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO RE-WRIGHT it all and DROP EM ALL IN FOR EXERYONE?
June 24, 2007 at 3:45 pm

#888287
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Re: copyright
[SIZE=-1]Do you feel that of of thes documrnts people have a wright to see on your forum?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Note: The following documents are in PDF format.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.[/SIZE]
Document 1: .
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 3:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 4:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 5:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 6:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 7:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 8:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 9:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 10:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 11:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 12:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 13:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 14:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 15:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 16:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act
June 24, 2007 at 3:46 pm

#888288
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Re: copyright
And,

[SIZE=-1]Note: The following documents are in PDF format.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.[/SIZE]

Document 16:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 17:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 18:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 19:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 20:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 21:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 22:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 23:

Document 24:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 25:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 26:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 27:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 28:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 29:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 30:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 31:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 32:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 33:
Source: Declassified through Congressional investigation

Document 34:
Source: Court exhibit

Document 35: “
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 36:
June 24, 2007 at 3:46 pm

#888289
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
and’

Document 37:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 38:
Source: Declassified through Congressional investigation

Document 39:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 40:
Source: Declassified through Congressional investigation

Document 41:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 42:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 43:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 44:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 45:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 46:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 47:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 48:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 49:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 50:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 51:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 52:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 53:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act
June 24, 2007 at 3:46 pm

#888290
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Re: copyright
And,

Document 54:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 55:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 56:
Source: Court exhibit

Document 57:
Source: Declassified through Congressional investigation

Document 58:
Source: Declassified through Congressional investigation

Document 59:
Source: Declassified through Congressional investigation

Document 60:
Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Document 61:
Source: Court case

and,
[Document 21]. [Note 1]. Document 24]. [Document 25].” [Document 25]. [Document 26].
[Document 28].[Document 31].
Document 32]. [Document 36 Document 37].
” [Document 47].[Document 48]. Document 61].
[Document 55]. [Document 44]
[Document 57]. [Document 58]. [Document 41]. [Document 42].
[Document 43].
[Document 52].
[Document 50].
[Document 54].
[Document 51].
[Document 53].
[Document 60].
[Note 2]. [Note 3].

Can I post all these Please?
June 24, 2007 at 3:48 pm

#888291
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Links are fine but I think you’re preaching to the converted. I can’t see many people on site not sharing your views…

Dr B

What views are you refering to, that its wrong to deal weapons of mass destruction that kill people?
June 24, 2007 at 3:49 pm

#888292
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Links are fine but I think you’re preaching to the converted. I can’t see many people on site not sharing your views…

I dont quite understand what you mean by that!

In any case, that litricicure was about “FREEDOM OF INFOMATIOT”

Not copyright control of infomation!

There is no Referance to copyright at;

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82

Incerdently, i am not a muslim by faith, i am a

Human like you.
June 24, 2007 at 3:49 pm

#888293
[deleted]

@[deleted]

Guest
Re: copyright

Incerdently, I HAVE read the PV RULES & CONDITIONS, and understand about COPYRIGHT.

Surly, it is my responserbility anyway, not yours, to post responsible for my own posts.

I dont quite understand what you mean by that!

In any case, that litricicure was about “FREEDOM OF INFOMATIOT”

Not copyright control of infomation! There is NO Referance to copyright at;

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82

Incerdently, i am not a muslim by faith, i am a Human like you.

Quote:

We have the same policy for video clips as text although it’s not always possible to catch it all.

Thats strange, cos you seem to be telling people how to do it at;

http://www.partyvibe.com/vbulletin/s…ad.php?t=25612
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)

1 2 →

The topic ‘JUSTICE’ is closed to new replies.