Party Vibe

@Dumbblonde 373713 wrote:

i am most interested in policing issues as it is quite a grey area.

It’s not a fucking grey area. If it’s not illegal it’s none of their business.

When they arrest someone for smoking a joint they always say “It’s not my opinion but its the law.”

It should be exactly the fucking same here.

They don’t like it but it’s not illegal so they should keep their fucking noses out of it.

@p0ly 373728 wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5QNzZKFItY

i’ve spoken to mad hippy quite alot about legal highs and made him see sense to say they all suck and don’t do much at all, if the government think they’re weak and crap less chance of legislation. these convos were after that video though :love:

lol

salvia wud be the strongest legal ive done. once was enough for me.

@Dumbblonde 373713 wrote:

I would not be doing the study if i wasnt something i was *personally interested* in.

The specific aims are looking at the implications of using legal highs with regards normalisation, drug cultures, side effects and i am most interested in policing issues as it is quite a grey area. So for intstance if anyone has been detained or finger printed after being caught with legal drugs.

As there is no current research the ethics commitee have agreed for me to quantitatively anaylse peoples personal experiences and issues good or bad using legal highs obtained from chat forums.

Any comments most welcome, thanks.

doesn’t sound like a very good dissertation to me, far to vague aims with no specific goal. It does sound like lots of info ITV etc would like though for some shock doc on drone etc. Plus, getting data from people in this the manor would not be an acceptable sampling method…

this is the third dissatation that some one has asked us to help with in the last week O.o

BO!

opps,

OB!