Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Luton Parade Protested by Muslim Extremists

Forums Life Spirituality, Morality & Religion Luton Parade Protested by Muslim Extremists

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 42 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Quote:
    After the September 11 attacks in America in 2001, he displayed posters around the town celebrating the ” Magnificent 19″ hijackers. After the al-Muhajiroun group was banned and Bakri fled, he changed his name to Abu Saif.

    Deport the ass.

    Quote:
    It was then that he met Bakri. Within two years, he had changed his name to Sayful Isman – which means Spirit of Islam – and had become a full-time activist, living off job seekers allowance.

    We fund religious activists praising violence, woo!

    Quote:
    “They have killed, maimed and raped thousands of innocent people. They can’t come here and parade where there is such a Muslim community.”

    Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. How dare you say that. I don’t want your damn protests of burning effigys and placards demanding to behead anyone who insults your petty violent religion but that would be ‘racist’ wouldn’t it?

    Quote:
    Meanwhile a teenager who allegedly shouted racist abuse at the Muslim protesters has been charged with harassment.
    Nathan Draper, 18, said that he was “maddened” at the actions of the Muslim demonstrators and praised the bravery of the soldiers and said they should be supported for risking their lives.
    He has been charged with racially aggravated harassment and is due to appear at court next week.

    Excepts from an article about the Luton parade by the Telegraph.
    Full article here

    With bullshit like is it’s understandable that some would vote for BNP as they’re the only group who actually acknowledges there’s a problem, but then they’re the BNP so they’re not worth voting for. They’re just a quick solution to a major problem and not what is needed in the long term.

    I would protest against the attempts of changing our freedom of speech that is happening at the United Nations but I don’t want want to get imprisoned for ‘inciting religious hatred’ or ‘being racist’ or whatever bullshit they come up with. However, it seems that we need to start doing this regardless as this is becoming too big to ignore.

    This is not some phase of cultural integration.

    This is a war against the Magna Carta, we cannot afford to lose it.

    Mate seeing those dickheads protesting against our troops pissed me right off. Absolute disgraceful. What fucked me off even more was the fact the police PROTECTED them and let them carry on with their hate filled rubbish. I loved it when the rest of the crowd turned on the protesters, I wish the OB were not there as i would of paid good money to watch them get smashed up.

    I love our armed forces and to watch BRITISH citizens (i assume they are) slating them in this manner boils my blood, I’m all for freedom of speech but theres a time and a place and that wasn’t the time. Shame on Bedfordshire police for allowing this to happen. :hopeless:

    its not possible any more to deport people who are born in the UK and are thus British citizens because they are behaving like scum.

    Britain historically dumped a lot of its unwanted criminal scum on other nations (transportation) – slapped them about on prison camps; they then eventually brutalised the natives and built their own empires which is partly why the world is in such a mess anyway.

    Quote:
    This is a war against the Magna Carta, we cannot afford to lose it.

    its already been lost. It is a vastly overrated document – it only gave rights to landowners (barons) and their followers, not the common people (something both the Levellers and the Diggers pointed out in the 17th century!) and most of it was actually repealed hundreds of years ago during various political wrangles and has been replaced by more modern legslation in line with todays capitalist society.

    In recent times, the terrorists have been so successful in striking fear into the governments of this nation that its last remaining part (the law on habeas corpus which means people shouldn’t be detained without trial) is under serious threat.

    I actually had only the ‘Freedom of speech’ part of the Magna Carta in mind, sorry for the misunderstanding :hopeless:

    DJCliffy;313029 wrote:
    Mate seeing those dickheads protesting against our troops pissed me right off. Absolute disgraceful. What fucked me off even more was the fact the police PROTECTED them and let them carry on with their hate filled rubbish. I loved it when the rest of the crowd turned on the protesters, I wish the OB were not there as i would of paid good money to watch them get smashed up.

    its the same as the feds having to protect BNP marchers…

    if it had kicked off, with all the mobile phones available today both sides would have called for backup, and soon the whole of Luton and surrounding areas would have been alight with everyone taking sides and eventually a race war starting.

    Loads of innocent people would have got hurt and / or lost property (rioters don’t tend to trash their own cars!), and it would end up like some Northern or Midlands areas where communities are still divided after riots/disturbances 5 or even 10 years ago.

    General Lighting;313033 wrote:
    its the same as the feds having to protect BNP marchers…

    if it had kicked off, with all the mobile phones available today both sides would have called for backup, and soon the whole of Luton and surrounding areas would have been alight with everyone taking sides and eventually a race war starting.

    Loads of innocent people would have got hurt and / or lost property (rioters don’t tend to trash their own cars!), and it would end up like some Northern or Midlands areas where communities are still divided after riots/disturbances 5 or even 10 years ago.

    Ah so probably was a good thing the OB were there, (I’m not far from Luton!!) 😉

    Freedom of speech can be seen as a tricky thing, but it’s actually quite simple:

    If you support it then you have to support the rights of people saying that the gas chambers in Auschwitz didn’t exist or whatever.
    The people who say these things may be wrong, and it may insult/offend but they have the right to say it and should not be criminalised for it.

    I defend the right for people to make asses of themselves and not to be ordered to court for it.

    Wasn’t a dutch(?) MP banned from entering the UK recently because of an anti-islam video he wanted to show the house of lords? Makes me laugh, The extremists can sprout their hatred publicly under police protection while someone doing the opposite is barred from the country. Funny old world innit! :you_crazy

    DJCliffy;313042 wrote:
    Wasn’t a dutch(?) MP banned from entering the UK recently because of an anti-islam video he wanted to show the house of lords? Makes me laugh, The extremists can sprout their hatred publicly under police protection while someone doing the opposite is barred from the country. Funny old world innit! :you_crazy

    yes, but I am fairly sure that in the same week or a similar timescale the Home Office banned him, an Muslim extremist and (for good measure) a black gangsta rapper who was well known for crime/drugs and glorifying this in his lyrics.

    People pay lip service to “free speech” and “persecution” when something they agree with is stopped but are happy to ask the authorities to ban things they don’t agree with.

    TBH I think the Home Office is finally saying “enoughs enough” and starting to set boundaries, but where will it end? bear in mind websites glorifying drugs and drug culture are viewed by some to be as bad as militant muslims or right wing extremism or religious brainwashing!

    General Lighting;313044 wrote:
    yes, but I am fairly sure that in the same week or a similar timescale the Home Office banned him, an Muslim extremist and (for good measure) a black gangsta rapper who was well known for crime/drugs and glorifying this in his lyrics.

    People pay lip service to “free speech” and “persecution” when something they agree with is stopped but are happy to ask the authorities to ban things they don’t agree with.

    TBH I think the Home Office is finally saying “enoughs enough” and starting to set boundaries, but where will it end? bear in mind websites glorifying drugs and drug culture are viewed by some to be as bad as militant muslims or right wing extremism or religious brainwashing!

    [yt]9wJsovPRTEM[/yt]
    [yt]N5NJoZRYOJk[/yt]
    i know this is in america .. but almost the exact same thing is happening here

    DaftFader;313047 wrote:
    i know this is in america .. but almost the exact same thing is happening here

    the whole concept of todays “free speech” is very new, it only came about in my lifetime around the 1980s. Despite recent law changes, today in 2009 the Met “permit” all sorts of random protests in London which would have been closed down with force 20 years ago.

    but the “freedom” we have today wasn’t even real progress done with good grace, it was simply a by-product of the social experiments of Thatcher, who relaxed Government control over the media and electronics communications networks and starved the Police and other agencies of investment as an accidental part of her “free market” ethos to encourage capitalism.

    it was not an attempt to give people more real freedom, Thatcher herself has expressed regret for the “way things turned out”.

    General Lighting;313057 wrote:
    the whole concept of todays “free speech” is very new, it only came about in my lifetime around the 1980s. Despite recent law changes, today in 2009 the Met “permit” all sorts of random protests in London which would have been closed down with force 20 years ago.

    but the “freedom” we have today wasn’t even real progress done with good grace, it was simply a by-product of the social experiments of Thatcher, who relaxed Government control over the media and electronics communications networks and starved the Police and other agencies of investment as an accidental part of her “free market” ethos to encourage capitalism.

    it was not an attempt to give people more real freedom, Thatcher herself has expressed regret for the “way things turned out”.

    as soon as the people that are in power of me .. (ie. the govenment that rules the contray i am living in)start talknig about my protecting my “freedom” i get suspisious .. as as it stands they seem to be the only ones restricting it
    i know there are alot of worce contrys to live in with regards to freedom but what scares me is that in them contrys it is blatenly forced, in a violent way, onto them, where as over here alot of the time it’s done with the majoritys concent as they are tricked into thinking they are beliving/voting for the right thing .. when really they are just falling into the trap and becoming pawns or the govenments games and are enpowering them beyond all belief and i feel this is much more dangerous in the long run than a violant govenment that every one disagrees with as it’s also a form of brainwashing so people will get fucked over .. and like it!

    Having lived through Thatcho’s days I think its far worse than that, the majority of British people do not want total freedom and want a reasonably strong government. its not as if the bitch seized power via a military coup, and nor was the spin that full of lies etc, people voted for her knowing what she stood for, as previous to then the trade unions had flexed their muscles but pissed off the public by causing disruption to essential services such as rubbish collection, electric, water, telephones etc due to strikes. And there was a economic recession.

    back then the Muslims would have been prevented from protesting, either by the Met SPG or the NF kicking shit into them (not much difference between the two) and it would have erupted into a race war, cops would have stormed in and beaten shit out of anyone what wanted to be stubborn.

    and everyone would have just ended up hating each other for years anyway until they were forced to grudingly interact due to business pressures. TBH thats what happened in the 1980s anyway and how British society still operates 25+ years later.

    General Lighting;313061 wrote:
    Having lived through Thatcho’s days I think its far worse than that, the majority of British people do not want total freedom and want a reasonably strong government. its not as if the bitch seized power via a military coup, and nor was the spin that full of lies etc, people voted for her knowing what she stood for, as previous to then the trade unions had flexed their muscles but pissed off the public by causing disruption to essential services such as rubbish collection, electric, water, telephones etc due to strikes. And there was a economic recession.

    back then the Muslims would have been prevented from protesting, either by the Met SPG or the NF kicking shit into them (not much difference between the two) and it would have erupted into a race war, cops would have stormed in and beaten shit out of anyone what wanted to be stubborn.

    and everyone would have just ended up hating each other for years anyway until they were forced to grudingly interact due to business pressures. TBH thats what happened in the 1980s anyway and how British society still operates 25+ years later.

    yeah people seem to be happy to have there rites/freedom taken away in order to have what they dont belive in put to a stop … and the thing that is the threat to the population seems to keep changing (slltho this is the second ressesion in 20 years) first ressesion .. so it al get tightened up like what you are saing .. then terror .. more laws … we forget about that .. now another ressesion … and the govenment will soon own most of the bank and god know else they are getting out of our missfortune .. and it goes on …

    DaftFader;313071 wrote:
    yeah people seem to be happy to have there rites/freedom taken away in order to have what they dont belive in put to a stop …

    yep it was as soon as their consumer society is threatened..

    we had a recession in 2001 – before 9/11 but of course the attacks made things worse.

    I don’t think the terrorist threat has changed all that much, both the Irish Civil War (still unresolved) and Middle East funded terrorism was a risk in 1989 as they were in 2009 – the balance of each threat may have shifted but its still there. I don’t believe the conspiracy theories – not when there is so much raw hate on the streets that any form of war/terrorism/conflict is possible anywhere if just a few young men get angry enough…

    However I was thinking a few weeks ago about how in some respects its become like groundhog day and (other than technology) we’ve returned socially to how it was in 1988/89 – everyone (including lads what would have once partied together) forming factions, people going back to booze instead of pills (despite acid house good pills were hard to get), more fighting in the streets and people robbing each other even at “fun” places like raves…

    but the problem I see is the carefree fun times of the 90s won’t come back because they depended on abundant cheap energy (oil) and peak oil has passed, and (at least for me) using drugs to escape isn’t a option as much as the issues are so strong no amount of substances lets me escape thiking about them..

    I don’t think the end of the world is coming but everyone is going to have to rethink a lot of aspects about how they live..

0

Voices

40

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 42 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Life Spirituality, Morality & Religion Luton Parade Protested by Muslim Extremists