A 26-year-old man will go on trial today for allegedly posting a message on Twitter threatening to blow an airport “sky high”.
Paul Chambers denied “tweeting” the message about Robin Hood Airport, in Doncaster, South Yorkshire, on January 6.
Chambers, of Byram Court, Balby, Doncaster, was arrested after the post was picked up on the social networking site by routine investigations.
He pleaded not guilty to a single charge of sending, by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character.
He will be tried at Doncaster Magistrates’ Court
Man accused of airport threat tweet – Crime, UK – The Independent
I wonder how they define grossly offensive, indecent and obscene! That seems a very broad far reaching law….
Its been on the statue books since the Telecommunications Act 1984!
To be fair the feds are proportionate about it, otherwise this site would have been closed down ages ago. You won’t get busted for swearing on the phone when talking to your mates, but the law is used to catch people using telecoms networks to harrass one another, such as stalkers and abusive ex-partners.
bear in mind also that in the area that lad was from, the Police and Security Service had found a significant number of angry white men who were making viable IED’s for planned use against Muslims and other ethnic minorities as a reprisal against multiculturalism and the BNP “going soft” – also there is more of a culture of normal criminals using IEDs up North, so “jokes” about bombs are much more liable to be taken seriously, even if the lad wasn’t Muslim!
@General Lighting 383246 wrote:
bear in mind also that in the area that lad was from, the Police and Security Service had found a significant number of angry white men who were making viable IED’s for planned use against Muslims and other ethnic minorities as a reprisal against multiculturalism and the BNP “going soft” – also there is more of a culture of normal criminals using IEDs up North, so “jokes” about bombs are much more liable to be taken seriously, even if the lad wasn’t Muslim!
I dont think its bad they are looking into the situation posted I was just surprised by seemingly how far reaching the law seemed. But then law is often like that and I guess test cases public interest common sense and 101 other things are taken into account as you say.
0
Voices
1
Reply
Tags
This topic has no tags