Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Obama is to Reverse Stem Cell Ban!

Forums Life Politics, Media & Current Events Obama is to Reverse Stem Cell Ban!

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Quote:
    US President Barack Obama is expected to lift restrictions on federal funding for research on new stem cell lines.

    BBC NEWS | World | Americas | Obama is to reverse stem cell ban

    I didn’t think he’d actually do it, wonderful news.
    As long as he can keep back the pressuring from the religiously insane that is.

    Ahh this is such good news! :love:

    This is outrageous! What would God/Allah/Mr Blobby say when he/she thought that we could try and find cures for most major diseases and generally try and make the world a better place through stem cell research! :you_crazy:you_crazy

    This is of course brilliant news! :love:

    Was just thinking about the anti-abortionist view and it struck me about where the stem cells come from and their argument that it’s denying them the right to life.

    But I don’t actually know where the stem cells come from, surely they’d just die off anyway seeing as these have come from people obviously not wanting to procreate, so why not make them useful.

    O-D;312513 wrote:
    Was just thinking about the anti-abortionist view and it struck me about where the stem cells come from and their argument that it’s denying them the right to life.

    But I don’t actually know where the stem cells come from, surely they’d just die off anyway seeing as these have come from people obviously not wanting to procreate, so why not make them useful.

    that’s a very good point .. it’s not like you save all your spurm and give each individual one an egg to fertalise just because they may become babys … i am sure most men waste alot of there spurm .. does this mean they are all going to hell? same goes for women … they don’t wanna have kids every month .. so there eggs NATURALY get ejected from there body on there period … not all eggs were entended to be used to procreate otherwise women wouldn’t have periods!

    NB:I am a IT/telecoms engineer, not a biologist, but have tried to work out what the fuss is..

    apparently with some current procedures it does require taking a few cells out of a fertilised 5 day old human embryo – presumably using the same techniques as “test tube babies”. This embryo is presumably then destroyed and disposed of as clinical waste – but it is a collection of cells, not even a human being or any defined species (I think all mamallian embryos are very similar at that stage, any real biologists are welcome to clarify this..)

    But for others stem cells can be obtained from various parts of an adult human (I am not sure if you use a dead one or alive one!)

    Mr Obama has already said he will try and ensure it isn’t used to clone humans – although I’m unsure why any nation would need to clone humans, it only takes a few seconds to create another one and 9 months to incubate it and humans aren’t exactly endangered…

    I’m surprised the Vatican are opposed, I’m a former Catholic and we were told 2008 years ago some woman managed to have a miraculously have a entire baby without any hanky-panky… which is far more outlandish than stem cell research :laugh_at:

    General Lighting;313480 wrote:
    it only takes a few seconds to create another one

    speak for yourself mate 😉

    :weee:

    boothy;313506 wrote:
    speak for yourself mate 😉

    :weee:

    if you’re discussing science rather than pleasure its all thats needed though (whether intentional or by accident) – I know 3 couples who’ve recently had these “accidents” (although all of them are now proud parents)

    but thats exactly why theres no need for yanks to get paranoid about human cloning – there are plenty of other things to worry about, if the “system” needs a large number of slaves it can and will get them from the existing human population especially in poor areas (after all its where half their military come from) – the scientists have only managed to clone a rather unhealthy sheep and a few domestic pets having spent billons of dollars…

    General Lighting;313508 wrote:
    if you’re discussing science rather than pleasure its all thats needed though (whether intentional or by accident) – I know 3 couples who’ve recently had these “accidents” (although all of them are now proud parents)

    but thats exactly why theres no need for yanks to get paranoid about human cloning – there are plenty of other things to worry about, if the “system” needs a large number of slaves it can and will get them from the existing human population especially in poor areas (after all its where half their military come from) – the scientists have only managed to clone a rather unhealthy sheep and a few domestic pets having spent billons of dollars…

    yeah but it takes nateral selection out of the equation .. and they could breed a super race of nasty people .. find the most merdorus loyal person and make millions of them …

    DaftFader;313509 wrote:
    yeah but it takes nateral selection out of the equation .. and they could breed a super race of nasty people .. find the most merdorus loyal person and make millions of them …

    Isn’t that what has happened in at least half of the USA already? “Natural selection” can breed angry warlike people just as easily if not better than any scientific stuff..

    General Lighting;313510 wrote:
    Isn’t that what has happened in at least half of the USA already? “Natural selection” can breed angry warlike people just as easily if not better than any scientific stuff..

    yeah this is true … but if they really wanted .. these clones could be reard from birth and they would have army training from day one .. i know alot of the kids in them kinda familys are exposed to guns at an early age .. they are not scientific tests .. and with human cloning if they do it they aren’t gonna stop there .. they are gonna try and make the hardest living things they can …

    DaftFader;313512 wrote:
    yeah this is true … but if they really wanted .. these clones could be reard from birth and they would have army training from day one .. i know alot of the kids in them kinda familys are exposed to guns at an early age .. they are not scientific tests .. and with human cloning if they do it they aren’t gonna stop there .. they are gonna try and make the hardest living things they can …

    Its still a lot more expensive and complicated than other tried, tested and working ways of achieving this such as indoctrination into fighting at a early age (such as child soldiers in other nations), or even the kung-fu school Jackie Chan went to because the Sifu dude bought him off his parents who were young and couldn’t afford to raise him – otherwise the British would have bought him (the price was HK$25) and he would have been sent to a boarding school and become a copper or soldier.

    Even today, a live human baby can be purchased for £150-£200 in poorer nations.

    DaftFader;313509 wrote:
    yeah but it takes nateral selection out of the equation .. and they could breed a super race of nasty people .. find the most merdorus loyal person and make millions of them …

    that comes down to the nature vs. nurture argument, the argument biologists and sociologists have had for years

    personally i think that nurture is the dominant aspect in terms of what decides your personality, moral values etc.

    some think that people can be born into a personality or mindset through biology but i’d say it’s 98% if not 100 nurture, upbringing etc. therefore just because someone is cloned it doesnt mean they are going to be the same person just cos they have the same physical attributes

    boothy;313520 wrote:
    that comes down to the nature vs. nurture argument, the argument biologists and sociologists have had for years

    personally i think that nurture is the dominant aspect in terms of what decides your personality, moral values etc.

    some think that people can be born into a personality or mindset through biology but i’d say it’s 98% if not 100 nurture, upbringing etc. therefore just because someone is cloned it doesnt mean they are going to be the same person just cos they have the same physical attributes

    yeah but the point i am making is they will be beefy fuckers brought up by the people who made them .. and if they have the knolage to clone a human .. then i am sure they can “nurture” that clone into becoming a nasty fuck as they will be the only contact it has with other humans so can mold there minds to however they feel fit … if it isn’t nurture that defines these things .. then they got murders clones ..it’s loose loose situation if it happens

    my understanding is that science has moved on enough that stem cells can now be harvested without “killing” the embryo so the pro-lifers have no argument with it

    while i am pro choice i am anti abortion, if that makes sense… i would never want to deny someone else the right to choose to have an abortion, but if the foetus in question was mine, i would be totally against an abortion. even before i had children i found contraceptive methods like the coil upsetting… what it just a cluster of cells becomes a human being… and individual

0

Voices

20

Replies

Tags

This topic has no tags

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums Life Politics, Media & Current Events Obama is to Reverse Stem Cell Ban!