Forums › Drugs › Drugs Research, Drugs Studies & Media Requests › Perceptions of legal high use (online survey) – all welcome!
Hi,
I am a PhD student at London South Bank University and I am researching personal beliefs related to legal high use. If anyone has time, I’d be grateful if you could complete an online survey which takes about 15 minutes. This would really give us some interesting insights into various types of drug use and what sort of factors influence people’s decisions whether or not to use a particular type of drug. I’d like to encourage a broad spectrum of people to take part in this research project (regardless of whether they have taken any legal highs or illicit drugs before). This is an international study and no restrictions on country of residence exist.
The study has been reviewed and ethically approved via London South Bank University Research Ethics Committee (ref. 1457).
As a token of my appreciation, all respondents will be entered into a prize draw for a £50 Amazon voucher (if you wish to do so). The draw will take place on 1st August 2016 . The results will be available after the submission of my PhD thesis during 2017.
If you are interested in taking part, please follow the link below and feel free to share it with others.
https://qtrial2014.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJiiVK3FUEHwsR
If you would like to discuss any aspect of this study, please contact Ursula Blaszko via email:blaszkou@lsbu.ac.uk.
Can you post that again in a better colour font please?
@tryptameanie 984705 wrote:
Can you post that again in a better colour font please?
Hi,
Thanks for your message! I saw the text was impossible to read after I submitted the post. I edited the colour as soon I saw.
Thanks,
Ursula
Have I already taken part in this, is this an extension of someghing else recent?
Also, please post what you expect as a result, what is the actual question you would like to answer?
there is a similar thread from 2014 from what appears to be the same University – I cannot remember myself if I completed it as well ( I may have done so; I noticed that the “diversity monitoring” bit on this survey was also particularly well thought out) and if so wouldn’t want to accidentally duplicate and skew the results.
its not uncommon for research like this to span many years, much longer than a single students course duration – for instance there is a Swedish university where both the linguistics and zoology profs have been researching vocal communication between humans and the domestic cat for the last 25 years – but if this is a longer term project its worth putting up more details clarifying this (for instance the cat communication project is publicised on both the University website and the profs own personal webspaces along with other linked research projects).
Although I am not anywhere as smart as these profs I do have an interest in zoology and linguistics and found lots of other interesting research on these sites; it is also good publicity for prospective students and teachers!
Another long term project I’ve noticed online is the monitoring of wild geese populations across Northern Europe which involves Universities in DK, NL and an EU research team (one of the Profs is British and his name is Professor Anthony Fox :laugh_at:). This site combines both the high level research at the Universities with “crowdsourced” photos and sighting reports of the geese by local and visiting birdwatchers; as lots of people have phones with cameras and GPS receivers this is a valuable source of trustworthy data.
OK kitty cats and birds are generally viewed worldwide as far more cute than drug users (I don’t think the Swedish unis would have publicised research on NPS as SE has even stronger laws against drugs than UK) but IMO British Universities could easily adopt some of these good practices..
@General Lighting 984908 wrote:
there is a similar thread from 2014 from what appears to be the same University – I cannot remember myself if I completed it as well ( I may have done so; I noticed that the “diversity monitoring” bit on this survey was also particularly well thought out) and if so wouldn’t want to accidentally duplicate and skew the results.
its not uncommon for research like this to span many years, much longer than a single students course duration – for instance there is a Swedish university where both the linguistics and zoology profs have been researching vocal communication between humans and the domestic cat for the last 25 years – but if this is a longer term project its worth putting up more details clarifying this (for instance the cat communication project is publicised on both the University website and the profs own personal webspaces along with other linked research projects).
Although I am not anywhere as smart as these profs I do have an interest in zoology and linguistics and found lots of other interesting research on these sites; it is also good publicity for prospective students and teachers!
Another long term project I’ve noticed online is the monitoring of wild geese populations across Northern Europe which involves Universities in DK, NL and an EU research team (one of the Profs is British and his name is Professor Anthony Fox :laugh_at:). This site combines both the high level research at the Universities with “crowdsourced” photos and sighting reports of the geese by local and visiting birdwatchers; as lots of people have phones with cameras and GPS receivers this is a valuable source of trustworthy data.
OK kitty cats and birds are generally viewed worldwide as far more cute than drug users (I don’t think the Swedish unis would have publicised research on NPS as SE has even stronger laws against drugs than UK) but IMO British Universities could easily adopt some of these good practices..
Does chatting up pussy count as zoology and linguistics now then?
@tryptameanie 984910 wrote:
Does chatting up pussy count as zoology and linguistics now then?
I don’t know but have wondered as there are a surprisingly large number of good looking young lasses involved with animal protection charities in NL and surely they can’t all be undercover cops :laugh_at:
Still reeling from that time you tried it on with that horse that turned out to be 2 police in a pantomime costume are you GL? Seems it’s at least taught you some caution lmao.
its tolerated these days as long as everyone is consenting although a anti-capitalist protester a few years ago actually got nicked in SE England for calling a TVP police horse “gay” under some new EU animal welfare laws (the argument from Thames Valley was the horse hadn’t self-identified as such) :laugh_at:
Oh right, and as you’re Dr Doolittle you can attest that all those animals consented then?
if you lead a holy life anything can be forgiven..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1R0xS1eiuI
(this is to be fair impressive as the tiger is not exactly a cub, its a 6 month half grown juvenile , although the circus folk would have had to comply with all sorts of EU laws to bring it into the Vatican in the first place)
That tiger was more scared as he was under the age of consent and that was the pope.
@tryptameanie 984925 wrote:
That tiger was more scared as he was under the age of consent and that was the pope.
Also as part of the performers getting their tiger license the animal has to have a compulsory check up by the vet – vets are also often middle aged men who dress in white (the circus MC did mention that to the news as well) …..
0
Voices
11
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Drugs › Drugs Research, Drugs Studies & Media Requests › Perceptions of legal high use (online survey) – all welcome!