Party Vibe

Register

Welcome To

Points of disagreement and the Irish famine

Forums Life Politics, Media & Current Events Points of disagreement and the Irish famine

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Maybe not so much warned, as asked to try an keep it civil. i don’t wanna take sides, but i know what i think, and i thought your posts were just about within bounds, considering the provocation.

    But it is pointless trying to reason with some people, and given its an open forum…

    I don’t really buy the ‘both sides are as bad as each other’ viewpoint at all, but I guess it is the legacy of hundreds of years of British exploitation and racism.

    I’m not postin again on this topic, cos we will only end up with the thread bein locked again. i’ve spent many hours lookin at the contemporary sources on this, and anyone who wants to know the truth should do the same.

    Anybody wanna do a thread about the highland clearances/scottish history? ha ha

    I missed that thread, what is there to disagree with the Irish famine.

    Why did the thread get shut ?

    fair point

    Disagreement is fine. Controversy is fine.

    However, it started to move away from the Irish famine and started to become more about personal insults and digs. It would have gone on forever, there was no end. Feel free to discuss it again, I just hope it doesn’t turn out the same way.


      Staff

      I don’t think I have anything to defend..

      But I would like to know if you send a PM to the people who closed the

      thread,or was it just me who was lucky..

      You see,I don’t send PM’s to people I disagree with..:you_crazy

      Cant moderators just withdraw posts thats don’t conform to reasonable standards of civility?

      I don’t wanna read posts where people just abuse each other, but why cant the rest of us talk about political/historical issues?

      Raj gave these guys a warning (which i absolutely agree with), which actually seems to have been listened to (admittedly second time around), but then the thread was shut down anyway.:hopeless:

      I know its a tough call, knowing where to draw the line, but there are many subjects in the area of politics that are emotive.

      Angel, i PMed Raj as well, and i didn’t know anyone else wanted the thread shut, apart from mrAHC. My apologies, if i misunderstood.

      and I didn’t PM mrAHC, cos i dont need the abuse…

      marcusblanc wrote:
      Cant moderators just withdraw posts thats don’t conform to reasonable standards of civility?

      I don’t wanna read posts where people just abuse each other, but why cant the rest of us talk about political/historical issues?

      May have seemed the wrong thing to do, and maybe it was. Although if they had removed the posts they would have been accused of censoring political topics. This way it’s laid bare.

      It doesn’t stop anyone talking about it again I suppose. I Just hope it doesn’t go tits up.

      It may seem a bit over the top but on the grand scale of things partyvibe VERY rarely locks topics or removes posts. (apart from the complete rubbish threads/posts from trolls, designed to get a reaction)

      The thread went badly off topic and was degenerating into a flame war between some of the posters.

      If you wish to start a new thread specifically to discuss Irish politics you are free to do so. I hope it stays on track and civil.

      For any board members unsure as to how they are expected to behave please read the following links:

      Polite behaviour on the net
      Usenet Netiquette

      Ok, thats cool, it was gettin a bit out of hand, i guess. Its a pity that it degenerated tho. I’ve never really seen you lock a thread, so it was a surprise.

      I might start another thread tho, but maybe in a month or two…:bigsmile: lol!

      😉

      marcusblanc wrote:
      Maybe not so much warned, as asked to try an keep it civil. i don’t wanna take sides, but i know what i think, and i thought your posts were just about within bounds, considering the provocation.

      But it is pointless trying to reason with some people, and given its an open forum…

      I don’t really buy the ‘both sides are as bad as each other’ viewpoint at all, but I guess it is the legacy of hundreds of years of British exploitation and racism.

      I’m not postin again on this topic, cos we will only end up with the thread bein locked again. i’ve spent many hours lookin at the contemporary sources on this, and anyone who wants to know the truth should do the same.

      Anybody wanna do a thread about the highland clearances/scottish history? ha ha

      The Highland clearances actually had less to do with the English colonial drive than many think… (I’m Scots btw – it’s nice to blame the English, but unfortunately this isn’t really their fault).

      Mostly it was started because the Duke of Sutherland wanted more land, and decided this was the best way to do it (Sutherland is in the NW of Scotland). As with much of Scots history, we were stitching ourselves up far more efficiently than anyone else has ever been able to…:hopeless::hopeless::hopeless: (something Scots do well throughout our history, and I would argue are still doing with the current parliament:you_crazy:you_crazy:you_crazy).

      If you look at the most important battle of the uprising (Culloden), even though it is ostensibly the British government on one side, and Bonny prince Charlie’s on the other, the actual troop make up is less defined along nationlistic lines. The government troops included scots from many clans (including Campbell, Ross, Sutherland, Kerr, Cunningham etc etc), while the Bonny prince’s side included 300 English Episcopalians from Manchester…

      Trouble is (as was the case with the famine thread), historical fact and emotion are rarely good bedfellows, and fact gets distorted by what people want to believe. A good example of this is the history of Scottish tartans, which aren’t really Scottish at all, and certainly don’t go back to antiquity as is usually claimed (tartans were invented in the Victorian era, as a romanticising of Scots clans. Even plaid has no evidence of use before the Rebellion in Scotland – so Wallace certainly didn’t wear tartans. Geezers painted blue and wearing tartan skirts does make a better story though…:wink:)

      If you want a decent history of the clearances, try here.

      globalloon wrote:
      a good rule of thumb is to challenge the statement and not the person, that way it doesn’t become personal

      Nicely put and very concise Glo raaaraaaraaa

      i think its clear that MrAHC set out to destroy the thread from the outset. he didnt want the subject debated, and said so, then proceeded to escalate teh emotive and agressive stand points without really addressing the heart of the arguement.

      in my eyes its a shame that he has manipulated us into not discussing what is a very important topic. and while no-one was suggesting for a second that there would be resolution of the conflict on a forum, airing such a vital debate is what forums are all about, and hopefully the thread will serve to educate those with a limited grasp of what the conflict between ireland and england really entails.

      while globaloons rule of thumb is a good general one, sometimes it is clear that teh person and not their arguements are the problem. in thsi case MrAHC was intent on destroying rational dabate. its a shame that he was allowed to do so.

      If you want a decent history of the clearances, try here.[/quote]

      I know relatively little about the clearances in Scotland, just bits and pieces really, so i had a quick look at that site. It seems fair enough to suggest that the reality is not well represented by the common perception.

      But the site didn’t seem to be that well put together, by todays standards. That is not a criticism, of itself, but i just felt i had to have a quick check on who the website authors were, and how the website is funded.

      This wasn’t entirely clear to me, although i could see that it was hosted by a golfing holiday company, which seems a bit odd.

      You clearly know more about the subject than I, but i have to ask you, with all due respect, is this really the best site for historical info on the clearances, that you know of?

      Just to be clear, I am absolutely not trying to contradict your central points.

      USE wrote:
      i think its clear that MrAHC set out to destroy the thread from the outset. he didnt want the subject debated, and said so, then proceeded to escalate teh emotive and agressive stand points without really addressing the heart of the arguement.

      in my eyes its a shame that he has manipulated us into not discussing what is a very important topic. and while no-one was suggesting for a second that there would be resolution of the conflict on a forum, airing such a vital debate is what forums are all about, and hopefully the thread will serve to educate those with a limited grasp of what the conflict between ireland and england really entails.

      while globaloons rule of thumb is a good general one, sometimes it is clear that teh person and not their arguements are the problem. in thsi case MrAHC was intent on destroying rational dabate. its a shame that he was allowed to do so.

      I’ve got a lot of sympathy with this view, i have to say.

      Given how free our language is on many subjects, on this forum, I think it speaks volumes, that we cant seem to talk about such things without discord, or worry. This is not a criticism of the moderators, by the way! It is a criticism of the ‘core values’ of Britishness.

      There are always two sides (at least!) to every story (and tragic stories at every turn, on all sides), but, IMHO, this country has a guilty conscience…

    0

    Voices

    17

    Replies

    Tags

    This topic has no tags

    Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

    Forums Life Politics, Media & Current Events Points of disagreement and the Irish famine