Forums › Life › Computers, Gadgets & Technology › Forum, Blog & Community Software › registrations
Given the current climate of board abuse elsewhere I’m considering making us registered users only to preserve the good nature vibe we’ve enjoyed so far. What do you think!? hugh
TBH I don’t think there’s a sufficient threat here at the moment; and it doesn’t stop people using “throwaway” user IDs (psy-forum was always registration only) – idiots can still register; and as long as I can see the IPs I can often work out where someone is posting from (at least the country, and in some cases even the city they are in).
Unless you know otherwise, I’ve only had to delete one anon post threatening a user in the last 6 months – the chap threatening DJ Fattmann (who was based near to his area…) and (at least on the drugs forum) the facility for anon posting gives people an extra perception of privacy.
OTOH many people may no longer trust anon posts about parties, due to fake party postings on SJ……
At this time I wouldn’t suggest banning anon posting – however if more people abuse it and should it become a trade off between banning anon posting and banning IPs (with attendant risk of collateral damage) then we would have to reluctantly go to registered users only.
i haven’t felt a need for it here
but as i’m not involved in the technical side at all i wouldn’t know of any ‘attacks’ of that nature
board abuse
should that read bored abuse
but as i’m not involved in the technical side at all i wouldn’t know of any ‘attacks’ of that nature
should that read bored abuse
aye with 90% of message board abuse, there’s nothing technical or intelligent about what they are doing; its simply someone logging out trying to slag off someone else whilst using anon posting or a fake ID to conceal their identity.
There thankfully just isn’t that problem at the moment on partyvibe at the moment and i hope it stays that way.
the other 10% would be using an automated process to send repeated messages [something once used on SJ to fill people’s IM boxes], or to register lots of users (our new software has a system in place to prevent this).TBH I find it quite sad that people with programming knowledge actually put their minds towards designing things like this (ditto with spam and worms)
cant say ive noticed a significant ammount of “abuse” and i think that if we did do summat like reg’s only or someother defensive measure, then we would make ourselves a target. all trolls want is some attention, so if they realise they changed the way the site works, they would never leave. just ignore ’em. if it gets worse then there must be a shnidey way of detering them.
I agree, let’s concentrate on being welcoming and keeping the place as friendly as possible…
hugh
How do you do that Alex?
I’ve got a couple of people trolling my forum and it would b interesting to know if they are local (which means people we possibly know and have a grudge) or out of the area (which will probably mean someone who has found the board somehow and is trying to wind us up)
I’ve got a couple of people trolling my forum and it would b interesting to know if they are local (which means people we possibly know and have a grudge) or out of the area (which will probably mean someone who has found the board somehow and is trying to wind us up)
In some cases it only gets you as much info as which country they may be in-some ISPs give more info away than others when naming the gateway computers through which their users access the internet
When you get the IP address run a traceroute. On windows go to your command prompt and type tracert a.b.c.d where a.b.c.d is the IP address.
All sorts of IP addresses and hostnames will appear on the screen.
Sometimes you will get “trace complete” and a hostname and address, or you will see * * * appear repeatedly which means you have hit a firewall at the trolls ISPs end. In that case the hostname before it is the clue (which ISP they are running from)
here’s the end of one for Busy Bee.
10 vlan128-p0001-synetrix.synetrix.co.uk (217.65.146.129) 7.909 ms 8.290 ms 7.791 ms
11 fe8-1-p0008-stafford.synetrix.co.uk (217.65.147.14) 8.173 ms 7.996 ms 8.485 ms
12 fe3-0-pe0025-staffordlea.synetrix.co.uk (217.65.147.38) 9.225 ms 8.442 ms 9.840 ms
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
sometimes its a dead giveaway if you have a bit of geographical knowledge – NTL for instance name all their servers with an abbreviated regional tag. In other cases you may only get an ISP name, and have to do some detective work (add [url=”http://www.*”%5Dwww.*%5B/url%5D) to the front of the ISP name and you usually get their corporate sales website! ISPs for large public and private sector clients also often brag about their sales on this site.
In the above case (as well as the giveaway name at code 12) a simple check of the website of synetrix.co.uk shows that Staffordshire LEA are one of their major clients – this is how I worked out that “buzy bee” was probably a schoolkid in the midlands.
Even if you just get an ISP address you will find a lot of ISPs have their customer bases concentrated round certain areas
if its someones work address then sometimes the company name is in the hostname. That’s why its a very bad idea to troll from a work connection – there are boards where the admins would go straight to that companys IT dept if there was disruption!
NB: These address can be spoofed so this (like any kind of investigative work) is not 100% foolproof- but most trolls are not master hackers…
Cheers!
Should have known that actually. I perform the odd trace route here and there at work. Not really for spying purposes though, so it didn’t click.
Just following up on my little problem…
Any ideas from this:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.254.254
2 21 ms 23 ms 23 ms bthg412-hg3.miltonkeynes.broadband.bt.net [217.35.197.202]
3 23 ms 27 ms 24 ms 217.35.197.161
4 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms 217.35.197.234
5 24 ms 26 ms 23 ms 217.47.201.170
6 59 ms 59 ms 62 ms 217.41.219.5
7 32 ms 30 ms 25 ms 217.41.175.118
8 51 ms 26 ms 26 ms 213.120.62.237
9 24 ms 23 ms 26 ms 213.120.62.205
10 24 ms 26 ms 23 ms core1-pos4-2.bletchley.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.197.133]
11 26 ms 30 ms 26 ms core1-pos13-3.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.196.218]
12 27 ms 23 ms 26 ms bar6-pos8-0.ilford3.broadband.bt.net [194.72.20.122]
13 29 ms 26 ms 50 ms 217.47.200.179
14 27 ms 26 ms 26 ms 217.41.170.49
15 28 ms 27 ms 26 ms 217.41.170.113
16 27 ms 26 ms 26 ms 217.41.170.18
17 28 ms 32 ms 26 ms 217.47.200.165
sorry for the delay but in order to give you a reasonable answer I needed to check a few more BT addresses to pick up the routing pattern…
after trying 3 or 4 other traces it seems that the regional identifiers found in the hostnames from 10-12 are the key…
in your case the poster may be from the Ilford / East London / Essex area. my guess is that the regional identifier is from the nearest large BT exchange to the user.
Be aware though that if they are doing this from their work, the regional identifier will be from their employers main net gateway – which could be some distance away from their office if reached via a local private WAN. OTOH this sort of corporate network isn’t cheap and is costed by distance, so the user would not be that far away. I’d go for a 10 mile radius of Ilford, Essex.
Thanks for taking the time to check it out.
Seems odd. I was guessing that it was someone who knew some of us because they were using details of peoples looks, places they frequent etc.
But it would be possible to work some of that out through doing a bit of research of old posts etc. But this would have to be from the old board which is now deleted so this person must have been hanging around for a while.
Seems quite sad/disturbing that someone would make that much effort to try and bother us.
To be fair he/she isn’t that offensive but the constant ‘gay’ remarks and abuse to new people is a bit annoying as it is such a small board.
Thanks again though Alex.
0
Voices
10
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Life › Computers, Gadgets & Technology › Forum, Blog & Community Software › registrations