Forums › Life › Politics, Media & Current Events › The crappiest excuse for joining BNP… ever?
Demonstration over BNP councillor
Protesters have gathered outside Corsham town hall after the appointment of a British National Party councillor.
Michael Simpkins, 47, was handed a place on the town council because nobody else stood for election.
Prospective Conservative MP Wilfred Emmanuel Jones said the outcome was a “wake-up call” to everyone.
Mr Simpkins said people in Corsham do want BNP representation because nearly 700 people (13%) voted for the BNP at the last district elections.
Several hundreds of people turned out to protest ahead of Monday night’s town council meeting.
The ex-RAF policeman and now taxi driver said he joined the BNP three-years ago as his son was being taught about the Muslim faith at school.
“I’m a Christian, I cannot agree with the religion which is totally against my religion – that doesn’t make me a racist – I don’t hate Muslims. I don’t want to see this country turned in to an Islamic state.
“That doesn’t make me racist it just makes me a concerned British citizen.”
Mr Simpkins represents the Rudloe ward of Corsham Town Council.
bad enough that he got elected by default… but his justification for joining the BNP???
being taught about other faiths is a good thing. It promotes understanding and reduces conflict. The Muslim faith is not ‘totally against Christianity’… muslims include jesus as a muslim prophet, just not their main one.
so he’d rather support a party whose manifesto says that they would arm every citizen to defend their rights against the government :you_crazy and who would introduce forced deportation to people who are not british citizens than have information about various religions be given to his son at school
:head_bang
what a moron!
Oh right i though there was one excuse for it:
you are a retard?
Well that seems to sum up the people involved with the BNP
you are a retard?
Well that seems to sum up the people involved with the BNP
Sorry that won’t wash with me :get_you:
although the old guy is merely being too spinless to admit his hate, I think the situation is a lot worse.
The BNP lot aren’t retards, some of them are fairly intelligent but angry and ruthless. They know what they are doing and are prepared to bring this country to civil war if need be.
From what I hear on the street and on a lot of forums it seems that there are plenty of angry young men who are prepared to join or at least secretly support the BNP and are not ashamed to be doing so, even people who were (or still are!) involved in the free party scene…
(and there was once a time when any form of racism was seen as intolerable on this scene)
I’ve noticed a lot of ex-party people tend to shift right in their political views after the drugs stop working, especially as competition for jobs becomes more ruthless and highly qualified hard working immigrants get these jobs – there is more and more anger on the streets…
it is getting bad in the West and South West – and of course there is a flipside to this as immigrants who get hostile reception close their own ranks and society becomes segregated..
I fear that unless there is a massive change in peoples attitudes people are going to learn the hard way, the BNP will get actual power in some area,
This will then result in massive “capital flight” (investments in the area being taken away) of businesses run by ethnic communities – partly as a protest but also for security/safety reasons, they obviously won’t want their windows busted or their premises burned out!
the ultimate result will be further economic depresion and perhaps civil conflict as angry unemployed people take to the streets – it could all be avoided if people become more tolerant but sadly I don’t see it happening..
I was gonna put somthing else here but it makes me sound like a Right racist WHICH IM NOT! its just I cant quite find the words to explain wot I wanted to say,as soon as I can word it right I will post something:hopeless:
wrong wrong wrong!
even the Government (or at least Whitehall) admits there is a phenomenon where many white men of all ages and social classes now feel that they are “under siege” in Great Britain – their traditional patriarchal power base has been eroded since the late 1970s, and many blame multiculturalism and “political correctness” for this happening.
The rise in support for the extreme right is an unsurprising consequence of this.
The rise in support for the extreme right is an unsurprising consequence of this.
White european males are historically responsible for the subjugation of other minorities (sex, age, race, religion) an I have met men who feel like they are being held responsible for this simply because they’re white and male, (some of these have been decent, thoughtful, liberal men and some have been wankers)
To my mind strong secure people will deal with this ‘guilt by association’ in one way and insecure, ignorant and frightened people deal with it in another.
I know this is not really about this thread but in another post I said about a German guy who is the marina manager where I am and who referees our footy games most biasedly, in fact hes a blatent cheat really, well this guy has been living in OZ for 30yrs or so so has an aussie accent hes 60 but a very fit 60 and seems a quite hippyish sort of guy he does yoga an that well the other day he was chatting to a load of them down at the marina when the subject of Hitler came up to which he went in to his admiration for the guy and said how Hitler had saved the world from communism and what a fantastic job he had done and the fact that a few million people dead was a small price to pay for us not to have been made in to commies you have to remember that this is said to a audience of Americans, Aussies , Chinese even a Burmese and you would not of thought to look at him that he had these sort of views this American women who was there with her 14-15 yr old daughter said thats why she left Misissippi because of racism and bigotry so her girl wouldnt be brought up bigoted,any way everyone sort of put it down to him being a bit of :you_crazy but not 2 days later he started an agument with a young Aussie lad in a cafe because the Aussie said that George Bush was a cunt to which he went into how it was lucky that it was Bush in power and as he put it not some wimp like Jimmy Carter and that Bush was handling everything fine and what a great guy he was Ive just posted this to show that people have some very extreme views and that some people at first when you meet them you would never think that they had them:hopeless: its quite shocking really.
If it’s going to be another slander on the Turks then leave it and do some research first before making claims of mass murder.
I feel l should say something here. I know you’re probably “white European”, but nevertheless l think what you’ve said is a racist remark.
It is totally incorrect.
I won’t go into it, except to say can you please do some research that goes beyond the last 70 years, because the last 70 years = the history of Nazism.
You’re in effect saying the Nazi history is the only history there is.
The Celts, the Saxons, the Slavs, the Finns, all have been traditionally sedentery and peaceable, more so than other European tribes l gather, and they have a history going back hundreds / thousands of years.
And then you go on to give the same rhetoric BNP use – “white men shouldn’t all feel guilty … ” that’s how it starts hun.
Hitler wasn’t everything ya know.
Glo is totally right here, i think that if more people learnt about other faiths then it would help people to understand others better and help prevent the narrow minded bigotry
At school i remember my religious education (when i got out of C of E schools) was about all the main religions.
I actually enjoyed learning a bit about them, i really dont remember much about them now though.
It is totally incorrect.
I won’t go into it, except to say can you please do some research that goes beyond the last 70 years, because the last 70 years = the history of Nazism.
You’re in effect saying the Nazi history is the only history there is.
The Celts, the Saxons, the Slavs, the Finns, all have been traditionally sedentery and peaceable, more so than other European tribes l gather, and they have a history going back hundreds / thousands of years.
And then you go on to give the same rhetoric BNP use – “white men shouldn’t all feel guilty … ” that’s how it starts hun.
Hitler wasn’t everything ya know.
Funny but the nazis hadn’t entered my head.
Either you’ve misinterpreted what i’ve said (easy enough in this medium), you havent read my post properly or we disagree on this matter, maybe I should have made myself clearer, these are some of the reason’s that i believe are behind the ‘white-man-is-guilty’ syndrome
(i have to say here and now I think if you’re not perpretrating, supporting, or condoning subjugation its not logical to feel guilty simply because you were born the same colour, or in the same geographical area as some other mad bastard who did terrible things before you were even born, but tbh I have never yet come to a satisfactory conclusion regarding all aspects of this. I do, however, strongly believe we all have a responsibility to educate ourselves and act as decent human beings)
Historically (regarding the role of the male european) i was thinking more along the lines of the British and Roman Empires’ and the roman catholic church, not particularly peaceful or respective of other people’s cultures’, religions’, boundaries or beliefs. Some might say they were, and still can be, a little arrogant and patronising, believing in their overwhelming superiority. Even the lauded Greek democracy wasn’t, unless you were a male, over a certain age, a full citizen etc etc
I was thinking about all sorts of things . . .
from the fact that my sir name distinguishes me as property of either father or husband (an old, largely invalid argument now but still has its point regarding the prevelence of patriarchy) and the difficulties women in the UK had to overcome in getting the vote (not so long ago) . . .
to the ‘discovery’ and dismemberment of the ‘new’ worlds: the americas, australia, india, the opium wars in china, not to mention the slave trade and the fortunes amassed from cotton, silk, lumber, tea etc by illegal, immoral and unethical means.
Now I grant you that both the Queen Elizabeths and Thatcher were female but I beg you to disprove me when I say that europeans have lived in a patriarchal society for a fair bit now.
I know there’s a whole world of history out there where the ‘bad’ guys arn’t european but I still think that they did treat this world as their playground for a while (an i’m not even starting on UK, America, Russia and the middle east, china etc)
And as for white men not feeling guilty? (should they/shouldn’t they? a huge argument) Even if you don’t believe you should feel guilty that’s no reason to join the BNP. Guilt generates fear and fear generates anger. An honest sense of self-responsibility in life is essential to be a decent human being. Its what you do that counts . . .
join the BNP = not good
live a decent, honest, respectful life = good
This was hellish hard to write, still not sure it makes complete sense but I still stand by my original post where i basically said that in my opinion . . .
There is this very difficult guilt-by-association subject and different people deal with it in different ways, some join the BNP and some become sound human beings.
0
Voices
39
Replies
Tags
This topic has no tags
Forums › Life › Politics, Media & Current Events › The crappiest excuse for joining BNP… ever?